My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
May 5, 2009 City Council packet
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000's
>
2009
>
05-05-2009
>
May 5, 2009 City Council packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2025 5:12:46 PM
Creation date
1/14/2021 4:11:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
farther afield, have conspired to drive lower -income Americans away from these places over <br />the past 3o years. This is profoundly unhealthy for our society. <br />In his forthcoming book, The Wealth of Cities, my University of Toronto colleague "Iris <br />Kennedy shows that only wholesale structural changes, from major upgrades in <br />infrastructure to new housing patterns to big shifts in consumption, allow places to recover <br />from severe economic crises and to resume rapid expansion. London laid the groundwork for <br />its later commercial dominance by changing its building code and widening its streets after <br />the catastrophic fire of 1666. The United States rose to economic preeminence by periodically <br />developing entirely new systems of infrastructure —from canals and railroads to modern <br />water -and -sewer systems to federal highways. Each played a major role in shaping and <br />enabling whole eras of growth. <br />The Obama administration has declared its intention to open the federal government's <br />pocketbook wide to help us get through this recession, and infrastructure spending seems <br />poised to play a key role. Done right, such spending could position the United States for the <br />next round of growth. But that will entail more than patching up roads and bridges. <br />If there is one constant in the history of capitalist development, it is the ever -more -intensive <br />use of space. Today, we need to begin making smarter use of both our urban spaces and the <br />suburban rings that surround them —packing in more people, more affordably, while at the <br />same time improving their quality of life. That means liberal zoning and building codes <br />within cities to allow more residential development, more mixed -use development in suburbs <br />and cities alike, the in -filling of suburban cores near rail links, new investment in rail, and <br />congestion pricing for travel on our roads. Not everyone wants to live in city centers, and the <br />suburbs are not about to disappear. But we can do a much better job of connecting suburbs <br />to cities and to each other, and allowing regions to grow bigger and denser without losing <br />their velocity. <br />Finally, we need to be clear that ultimately, we can't stop the decline of some places, and that <br />we would be foolish to try. Places like Pitts burgh have shown that a city can stay vibrant as it <br />shrinks, by redeveloping its core to attract young professionals and creative types, and by <br />cultivating high -growth services and industries. And in limited ways, we can help faltering <br />cities to manage their decline better, and to sustain better lives for the people who stay in <br />them. <br />WI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.