My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
May 5, 2009 City Council packet
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000's
>
2009
>
05-05-2009
>
May 5, 2009 City Council packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2025 5:12:46 PM
Creation date
1/14/2021 4:11:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Date: April21, 2009 <br />REGULAR <br />Item: <br />Motion <br />ITEM: Water System Financing Team for Groundwater Contamination Area <br />SUBMITTED BY: Craig W. Dawson, Interim City Administrator <br />REVIEWED BY: David Snyder, incoming City Attorney <br />Jack Griffin, City Engineer <br />SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: Groundwater has been contaminated in the west -central and <br />southwestern parts of Lake Elmo. Properties having private wells have been negatively affected, and <br />residents are having their wells treated with individual granular activated carbon (GAC) systems, being <br />provided bottled water, or have been connected to a public water supply. The best long-term solution, in terms <br />of economic feasibility and reliable quality of water supply, is to expand the City's water system in order to <br />supply water to this area. Given the high cost to most effectively provide City water, the City needs to find <br />partners and sources for significant funds to make the needed improvements. The Council should consider <br />designating a core team to lead this effort, with the understanding that other key persons will be involved as <br />needed and the Council will be kept up-to-date and involved throughout. <br />BACKGROUND: The public costs for the water system improvements are estimated to be in the area of $6 <br />million, and the private costs to access the system are estimated to be in the range of $2 million to $3+ million. <br />Through a consent decree by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), 3M has provided funding for <br />the measures taken to date; however, these measures have not addressed the long-term need for a water <br />supply from the City. The City has had meetings with the MPCA and the Minnesota Department of Health <br />(MDH) as recently as last fall, and began some exploratory discussions about possible funding sources. It is <br />apparent that the needed funding will have to come from a variety of sources, and any reasonable opportunity <br />should be pursued. <br />Since then, staff has submitted application to be on the Project Priority List for the State's Drinking Water <br />Revolving Loan Fund for three water system improvements, including approximately $6 million for the <br />Southwest Area Watermain Extension Project. This is, however, a loan program, rather than a grant, and <br />would carry long-term costs. Federal stimulus funds may reduce the loan obligation. Staff has also submitted <br />a federal appropriations request through Senator Klobuchar's office for approximately $3.4 million for this <br />project in the 2010 fiscal year. <br />As recommended during the review of the Water System chapter for the Comprehensive Plan during the April <br />14 City Council work session, a "team" should be assembled for the necessary financial assistance resulting <br />from the groundwater contamination. The Council indicated its concurrence with this approach. <br />Suggested Team: As the City has had discussions with State agencies and 3M in the past, the mayor and city <br />administrator have participated on behalf of the City. Staff suggests that the persons in these two positions <br />continue to head up the City's team going forward. By their nature, these positions represent the Council and <br />the staff, and they carry weight in representing the City with others. As the mayor has been involved in past <br />meetings, there would be a continuity in the he has developed relationships with other parties. For increased <br />effectiveness, it is also important to the number of persons involved be small and have flexible schedules in <br />order to concentrate on this project. Additionally, if Council were to name two of its members to the team, it <br />would constitute a committee and need to notice anytime it would meet (per the Open Meeting Law), and <br />affect the flexibility of meeting with other parties. Anything the City's team might do that could be <br />characterized as negotiating would need to be done within parameters agreed upon by the Council. <br />With this approach, the leads on the City team would call upon key people (e.g., city attorney, city engineer, <br />perhaps other specialists) when appropriate to provide assistance. The Council would be kept up-to-date and <br />involved in decision -making throughout the process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.