Laserfiche WebLink
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources <br />Comment Summary: The city has a Water Appropriation Permit for 60 mg/yr <br />(Permit #1961-1031). It should be noted that increases in usage beyond the 60 mg/yr <br />would require DNR approval. This approval item should be included in Table 8-1. <br />Response: Table 8-1 will be revised to list the Water Appropriation Permit as follows: <br />Minnesota Department of Natural <br />Resources <br />Water Appropriation Permit for new municipal well, if needed <br />Temporary Water Appropriation Permit for construction dewatering <br />Public Waters Work Permit (for work within a DNR Public Water) <br />Water Appropriation Permit f# 1961-1031) Modification. to increase <br />usage beyond the mmutted amount (60 ms/vr. ) <br />Metropolitan Council <br />Comment Summary: The AUAR is complete and accurate. The Council does not <br />object to the Final AUAR. <br />Response: Comment noted <br />Valley Branch Watershed District <br />Comment Summary: The VBWD may update its rules and regulations to require the <br />volume controls proposed in the AUAR within the Downs Lake watershed. Permit <br />applicants will need to prove that they can meet the controls. The Executive Summary <br />states "maintain" existing volume vs. "not increase" volume from existing. <br />Response: The Mitigation Plan discussion of involvement by other agencies will be <br />updated as follows: <br />Involvement by Other Agencies, if applicable <br />Proposed development projects within the AUAR area will need to submit development plans <br />for approval by the City of Lake Elmo, the VBWD and for projects greater than 1 acre, and the <br />Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The VBWD has rules relating to stormwater <br />management plans, erosion control plans, floodplain alteration, drainage systems, and other <br />development activities. VB W D will require Dermit applicants to provide proof than 1) the <br />runoff volume difference between proposed and existingconditions is camured 2) the <br />proposed infiltration facility can infiltrate at the designed rate and 3) the runoff volume can be <br />infiltrated within 48 hours. <br />Response: The executive summary will be updated as follows: <br />The city will work with developers to provide runoff volume facilities adequate to maintain not <br />increase existing runoff volume for the 100-year rainfall event by implementing volume <br />control best management practices (BM -Ps) on their sites. <br />Ann Bucheck <br />Comment Summary: The Final AUAR fails to require that developers not increase <br />stormwater runoff volumes for the 100-year rainfall event. The AUAR should suggest <br />ordinances that could require this. The City of Lake Elmo should be the leader in <br />enforcing the rules for development in regards to potential water problems and <br />Face of? <br />