My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#02 - Cross Walk Discussion
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020's
>
2024
>
04-09-24 W
>
#02 - Cross Walk Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2025 1:20:56 PM
Creation date
8/16/2024 2:15:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> v <br />LIST OF FIGURES <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />Figure 1. Pedestrians have a right to cross the road safely and without unreasonable delay.......................1 <br />Figure 2. A zebra crossing used in Sweden.................................................................................................6 <br />Figure 3. Sign accompanying zebra crossings in Sweden...........................................................................6 <br />Figure 4. Pedestrian crash rates for the three crossing types by age group..................................................7 <br />Figure 5. High visibility crossing with pedestrian crossing signs in Kirkland, WA..................................11 <br />Figure 6. Experimental pedestrian regulatory sign in Tucson, AZ............................................................11 <br />Figure 7. Overhead crosswalk sign in Clearwater, FL...............................................................................11 <br />Figure 8. Overhead crosswalk sign in Seattle, WA. ..................................................................................11 <br />Figure 9. Example of overhead crosswalk sign used in Canada................................................................11 <br />Figure 10. Regulatory pedestrian crossing sign in New York State..........................................................11 <br />Figure 11. Cities and States used for study sample....................................................................................13 <br />Figure 12. Crosswalk marking patterns.....................................................................................................15 <br />Figure 13. Predicted pedestrian crashes versus pedestrian ADT for two-lane roads based on the final <br />model..................................................................................................................................................29 <br />Figure 14. Predicted pedestrian crashes versus traffic ADT for two-lane roads based on the final model <br />(pedestrian ADT = 300)......................................................................................................................30 <br />Figure 15. Predicted pedestrian crashes versus traffic ADT for five-lane roads (no median) based on the <br />final model..........................................................................................................................................31 <br />Figure 16. Predicted pedestrian crashes versus pedestrian ADT for five-lane roads (with median) based <br />on the final model...............................................................................................................................32 <br />Figure 17. Predicted pedestrian crashes versus traffic ADT for five-lane roads (with median) based on the <br />final model (pedestrian ADT = 250)...................................................................................................33 <br />Figure 18. Pedestrian crash rate versus type of crossing...........................................................................37 <br />Figure 19. Pedestrian crash rates by traffic volume for multilane crossings with no raised medians— <br />marked versus unmarked crosswalks..................................................................................................38 <br />Figure 20. Percentage of pedestrians crossing at marked and unmarked crosswalks by age group and road <br />type......................................................................................................................................................40 <br />Figure 21. Illustration of multiple-threat pedestrian crash.........................................................................41 <br />Figure 22. Pedestrian crash types at marked and unmarked crosswalks.....................................................42 <br />Figure 23. Severity distribution of pedestrian collisions for marked and unmarked crosswalks...............44 <br />Figure 24. Distribution of pedestrian collisions by time of day for marked and unmarked crosswalks....45 <br />Figure 25. Pedestrian collisions by light condition for marked and unmarked crosswalks.......................46 <br />Figure 26. Age distribution of pedestrian collisions for marked and unmarked crosswalks.....................47 <br />Figures 27–30. Percentage of crashes and exposure by pedestrian age group and roadway type at <br />uncontrolled marked and unmarked crosswalks.................................................................................48
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.