My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#10 - Chavez Variance
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020's
>
2025
>
02-04-25
>
#10 - Chavez Variance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2025 8:27:08 AM
Creation date
8/15/2025 8:26:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> <br />Though the report seems to suggest denial is somehow warranted because of the <br />location of the house, the house location is in its only reasonable spot-as far away from <br />the lake as can be done. Similarly, because the lot was created without road frontage <br />and in a smaller size-variances are unavoidable here. <br /> <br />The unique circumstances include that the City permitted creation of a lot and its <br />subdivision at a time when it was lawful to do so and did not require, at that time, the <br />provision of road frontage. Though today standards may be different, this is precisely <br />the reason variances exist. <br /> <br />V. Essential Character Of Locality Is Not Changed: <br /> <br />The report claims that “this request directly conflicts with the bluff and shoreland <br />regulations that were implemented to protect these sensitive areas.” <br /> <br />If there were not some disparity-then we wouldn’t need a variance. The potential for <br />conflicts with bluff and shoreland regulations which are adopted later are the very <br />reason for the grant and issuance of a variance with reasonable conditions attached. <br />They are not a reason for denial of it in the first place. If they were, then every variance <br />would be denied since, by their terms, the request is not in compliance with bluff and <br />shoreland regulations. <br /> <br />The inquiry here is whether this modest house on an approved, subdivided lot would <br />change the essential character of the locality. Development of the modest house on this <br />lot will not change the essential character of the neighborhood. Land adjacent to it is <br />being intensively developed for single family homes-in most or all cases-much larger, <br />more conspicuous and on small lots. Other homes, docks and other structures have <br />been built on the lake in these areas including with variances. Most other homes are <br />much larger and more intensive than this discrete home. This lot is consistent with <br />previous and future development on Sunfish Lake that maintains the essential character <br />of the locality. The locality includes the land around the lake and the subdivisions north <br />and east of it. <br /> <br />As it relates to the lake—there are numerous houses that exist or were built or were <br />expanded on lots like that and within bluff land and other setbacks. Simply put, <br />historical creation and development of homes and outbuildings have been allowed <br />extensively in this area. It will not change the essential character of the neighborhood in <br />any way to use this lot for its intended purpose-development of a single- family <br />lakeshore home. <br /> <br />Finally, the need for cooperation and coordination with the adjacent development is not <br />a reason to deny the variance—in fact it is typical that a city will compel the large,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.