Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> STAFF REPORT <br />DATE: June 3, 2025 <br /> CONSENT <br /> <br />TO: City Council <br />FROM: Nate Stanley, City Engineer <br />AGENDA ITEM: Approve Cooperative Cost Share Agreement for the CSAH 13 (Inwood <br />Avenue) Pavement Rehabilitation Improvements <br />REVIEWED BY: Nicole Miller, City Administrator <br /> Clarissa Hadler, Finance Director <br /> Marty Powers, Public Works Director <br /> Chad Isakson, Assistant City Engineer <br /> Jack Griffin, Senior Project Manager <br /> <br />CORE STRATEGIES: <br /> <br />☐ Vibrant, inclusive, connected community ☐ Efficient, reliable, innovative services <br />☒ Responsive, transparent, adaptive governance ☐ Balanced Finances now and future <br />☒ Managed Growth ☒ Resilient Infrastructure <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND: Washington County is completing pavement improvements along CSAH 13 (Inwood <br />Avenue) from CSAH 10 (10th Street North) to CSAH 6 (Stillwater Boulevard) this year. The <br />improvements include a reclaim and repave of the roadway and grading improvements, both to the <br />roadway and ditch system. The City of Lake Elmo has a 16-inch diameter trunk watermain line that runs <br />parallel with the roadway below the western ditch. Upon review of the County plans, it was observed that <br />ground cover over the watermain is being reduced to less than 7.5-feet due to ditch grading, over a stretch <br />from Ivory Avenue North to approximately 600-feet northward. City staff worked with the County to <br />incorporate insulation into the plans, to be installed over the watermain to protect the pipe from freezing. <br /> <br />ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL: Should the City Council approve the Cooperative Agreement between the <br />City of Lake Elmo and Washing County for construction costs of CSAH 13? <br /> <br />PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: Washington County has prepared plans and received bids for the <br />CSAH 13 improvements. Included in the bid package are improvements to insulate the existing in-place <br />city watermain where reduction of ground cover over the pipe became problematic due to proposed ditch <br />grading. The limits of insulation were determined through plan review and potholing the existing main <br />during final plan development to verify watermain depth. <br /> <br />City staff initially discussed potentially reconstructing the watermain to lower the grade of the pipe. <br />However, after receiving the pothole data confirming watermain elevations, it was determined that <br />excavating and placing styrofoam insulation would be a more cost-effective way to protect the pipe, as the <br />main was revealed to be deeper than originally thought. Leaving the pipe in-place also eliminates service <br />interruptions that would be experienced if the pipe was replaced. <br />