My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-02-25 City Council Meeting Packet
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020's
>
2025
>
09-02-25 City Council Meeting Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2025 11:37:19 AM
Creation date
9/2/2025 11:36:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />36 CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MN <br /> What is the scope of this position? Is this role intended to obtain grant funding and deliver capital projects <br />from the master plan? Is this role intended to plan and coordinate programming within the parks? <br /> Where in the City’s organizational structure should this role reside? If this role is in the Public Works <br />Department, what would be an appropriate title (e.g., Assistant Director, Manager)? <br /> When should this hiring occur? The multisport complex represents a large opportunity for the City but <br />lacks definitive plans. Should this position be filled to help the community plan its design, or be hired once <br />the park has been built? <br />Being intentional in answering questions of the “what” and “why” of this park leadership position will help create <br />agreement within the City as to the purpose of this role and help identify the ideal candidate for this envisioned role. <br /> <br /> <br />WORK PROCESSES <br /> <br />Recommendation 10: Implement the Beehive CMMS to fully utilize its capabilities <br /> <br />Industry standard software for public works departments includes asset management software that combines GIS <br />mapping with asset inventories to help track the location, condition, and maintenance performed on assets. When <br />asset management capabilities are combined with the capacity to issue, track, and complete work orders, these <br />software packages are known as Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS). The industry standard <br />practice is for work orders to be developed within the CMMS and assigned to operators. The operators perform the <br />work and record their work in the CMMS, and that work order is attached to the asset’s record within the CMMS. <br />Moreover, operators are commonly issued mobile devices so that they can access the CMMS in the field, allowing <br />them to use the GIS capabilities, receive work orders, and fill out the work orders without having to return to the <br />office. <br /> <br />A properly designed and implemented CMMS provides numerous advantages to organizations. It improves <br />workflows, communications, and analysis of asset conditions. It also allows reporting not just of the work that is <br />being done, but the backlog of work that is not being accomplished and may require more resources. It can be an <br />invaluable tool not just for tracking asset conditions but also for tracking workforce conditions. By showing the <br />amount of work that is being accomplished, the ratio of corrective to preventative maintenance that is occurring, and <br />the backlog of work orders, a CMMS can quantitatively make the case as to whether more staff are required. The <br />reports produced by a CMMS can aid leadership in making more informed decisions and be an effective tool to <br />communicate with parties outside the Department. <br /> <br />The City utilizes an asset management software program known as Beehive. Beehive has been in use for several years <br />within the Department and has been utilized to develop the Department’s asset inventory. Unfortunately, Beehive <br />does not include any Parks assets, as the Department has not purchased a Parks module. Additionally, it is not used <br />to its full capability work order system. Operators in the field primarily rely on Beehive for utility locates and GIS <br />mapping, using a mobile app version. In its role as an asset management program, work that is done on the utility <br />system is recorded within Beehive by the Assistant Director following the completion of the work. Work orders are <br />not issued prior to work, negating the ability to plan work or track work backlogs, and the sort of data that would <br />allow for the tracking of level of effort (e.g., labor hours, equipment, and supplies used) is not collected. Rather than <br />the Operators entering all of this data in the field and the Assistant Director performing quality control checks on <br />completed work orders, the Assistant Director enters data on asset status and the type of work performed. <br /> <br />To fully realize the value of Beehive, the Department should implement all of its functionality. This would involve <br />developing the work order capabilities of Beehive to include the most efficient recording of the data for that work.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.