My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#11 - Drake and DQ Preliminary Plat and PUD
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2020's
>
2023
>
03-21-23
>
#11 - Drake and DQ Preliminary Plat and PUD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2025 1:23:40 PM
Creation date
9/29/2025 1:20:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Landform® and Site to Finish® are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLC. <br />March 16, 2023 <br /> <br />Ms. Kristina Handt <br />City Administrator <br />City of Lake Elmo <br />3800 Laverne Avenue North <br />Lake Elmo, MN 55042 <br /> <br />RE: Response to Comments from March 13, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting <br /> <br />Dear Ms. Handt, <br /> <br />This letter is a follow-up to address the main concerns raised at the Planning Commission meeting held on March 13, 2023 <br />regarding the Ebertz Property/Drake Motor Partners Preliminary Plat and PUD application. The development team was not <br />given the opportunity to respond to the concerns raised by Commissioners and residents during the meeting. This letter is <br />a written response to concerns raised by residents and Commissioners and further detail the ways in which the applicant <br />will work with City Staff to address these concerns. <br /> <br />PRIVATE DRIVEWAY/LIGHTING <br />PUD flexibility is requested to allow for a private driveway to serve the lots on Block 2. This single design feature includes <br />four areas of flexibility: (1) to allow sole access from a private driveway, (2) to allow the creation of Lot 3, Block 2 without <br />public street frontage (frontage is provided on the private driveway), (3) driveway width to allow a 41-foot wide private <br />driveway at the point it intersects the right-of -way line, (4) increased lighting levels internal to the site along the shared <br />property line of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2. City Staff has indicated a desire for the private driveway on Block 2 to function <br />similar to a public street, which includes pedestrian connections, turn lanes and adequate lighting along the length of the <br />driveway for pedestrian and vehicle safety. The private driveway has been proposed because creating a public street and <br />right-of-way dedication does not provide a benefit to the City, applicant or adjacent property owners. Because the private <br />driveway on Block 2 is situated along the internal property lines between Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, lighting levels above the <br />allowed 0.4 footcandles along this shared property line are warranted for adequate pedestrian and vehicle safety <br />measures. The Code provides an exception for the maximum light cast for lighting located within and intended for a right- <br />of-way which aligns with our requested flexibility to design the private driveway to the standards of a public street. Lighting <br />will exceed the maximum 0.4 footcandles only along the private driveway between Lots 1 and 2, Block 2. The lighting <br />along the private driveway is consistent with the lighting that would be provided if it were a public street. <br /> <br />Flexibility is also sought for the lighting levels at the shared private driveway between the existing commercial property and <br />Lot 1, Block 1. The shared private driveway that was previously approved by the City warrants lighting levels above the <br />allowed 0.4 footcandles to improve pedestrian and vehicle safety. <br /> <br />We are not requesting to increase the allowed footcandles along any property lines adjacent to residential. The lighting <br />levels adjacent to residential are at or below the required 0.4 footcandles. <br /> <br />LANDSCAPING <br />Some residents voiced concerns over the preservation of existing trees and the proposed screening adjacent to their <br />properties. The previously submitted landscape plan exceeded the number of trees required for the site and included a 6- <br />foot fence was previously proposed along the north property line. However, in response to the resident’s concerns and to <br />address City comments we have revised the landscape plan to provide additional trees adjacent to the residential property <br />lines. Furthermore, the plans have been updated to include planting the trees on the future Lot 3, Block 2 in the first phase <br />of development, rather than when that lot is developed. We have also updated the plans to add a 6-foot high fence along
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.