Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development recommends conducting community engagement in house. The process will <br />include: <br />• Project announcement (City website, Fresh, social media) <br />• Town hall <br />• Public Survey (shared on social media, Fresh, City website) <br />• Public hearing at EDA (will mailing notices sent out to project area) <br />Does the Council support this community engagement strategy? <br /> <br />RFP for Parcel 3 <br />The TAP Report conveys that the northernmost parcel (Parcel 3) has the largest range of potential uses <br />and the most financial value. With that in mind, staff are weighing the potential benefits of engaging in <br />an RFP process for the site to engage with a range of accomplished developers nationally. Staff is <br />seeking feedback from Council on this possibility. <br /> <br />ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL: Does the City Council have guidance or feedback on next steps for the sale of <br />the City owned property at Ideal Ave and Stillwater Blvd? <br />• Does Council support this recommended phasing for the project? <br />• Does Council support engaging with Engineering to create a plan and determine costs for <br />expanding sewer to remaining sites? <br />• Does Council support hiring a commercial broker for Parcel 1? <br />• Does the council support renewing the AUAR on the City owned property at Ideal Ave and <br />Stillwater Blvd? <br />• Does Council support staff’s recommended community engagement strategy? <br />• Does Council have feedback about visioning for parcel three? <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS: <br />• Final ULI TAP Report <br />• Community Engagement Plan <br />• Phase 1 Timeline <br />