Laserfiche WebLink
<br />23 <br />216348v2 <br />SEARCH <br />(Check applicable boxes and describe as indicated) <br /> No search was conducted or necessary because <br />(explain): <br /> <br /> <br /> A search was conducted consisting of: (check all that apply) <br /> Market research <br /> Other vendors contacted <br /> Public notice given <br /> Other <br />RESULTS <br /> <br />AFTER THE SEARCH… <br /> <br /> no alternatives were identified <br /> no alternatives were deemed <br />acceptable (explain below) <br /> Description of search identified above: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />PRICE <br />(Check applicable boxes and provide description below) <br /> Price has been fairly and reasonably established by: <br /> <br /> Independent estimate <br /> Comparison to public sector contract pricing <br /> Comparison to previous comparable pricing <br /> <br /> Discount off published price <br /> Market survey <br /> Other <br /> Describe methodology and results (attach any written supporting data, e.g. survey or market analysis): <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CERTIFICATIONS <br /> I certify: <br />1) I recognize that state law requires the use of competitive solicitations unless exempted <br />by law. I have reviewed the information and materials relevant to this procurement of <br />services and am requesting approval of an exception to the competitive process for the <br />reasons described. <br />2) the price to be paid to the proposed single source contractor is fair, reasonable, and <br />provides the best value to the City of North St. Paul; and <br />3) this request for an exception to the competitive solicitation process is not the result <br />of inadequate advance planning or for purposes of securing the services of a <br />preferred contractor <br /> Department Head Signature Date <br />