03-18-2014 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 18, 2014 Page 2 of 5 ITEM 8: SCHILTGEN FARM PARCEL B SKETCH PLAN REVIEW. Community Development Director Klatt provided overview of the Schiltgen Farms North sketch plan submission. Explained the key issues that staff and the Planning Commission have identified as needing to be resolved prior to prelim plat. Mr. Klatt also explained the parkland, storm water retention, and open space discussions previously held. The proposed trails along with cul-de-sacs versus more grid-like planning were discussed. Mr. Klatt explained that the comp plan calls for more traditional style (grid-like) layout in the village area. Staff has asked for more direct route to connect the east and be in line with the village land use plan. The county’s concerns, including screening/berming on CSAH 17/Lake Elmo Ave. were noted. Both parks and planning commission have reviewed application. Mayor Pearson asked Mr. Griffin about traffic impact on street with various methods. Mr. Griffin noted that gridded does not necessarily mean straight roads. They can be curved and meandering. Important thing is to have connectivity. Connectivity benefits efficiency. Developer Dave Gonyea stated that they were open to idea of adding pocket park. Council consensus was supportive of having something available to neighborhood. Mr. Gonyea addressed the county’s concerns for Lake Elmo Avenue and noted that addressing it is in his interest. He also noted that they are considering using theming fencing. Mr. Gonyea further addressed the through-road and his concerns regarding the increased traffic. Council Member Bloyer asked which lots were quickest to sell. Mr. Gonyea said road safety has an impact on which lots sell first. Families with kids prefer cul-de-sacs and not though roads. Mr. Gonyea also explained their approach to storm water management. Mr. Bloyer asked about price point. Homes will probably start at $450K to $600K. Houses across the street will be probably $500 to $750K due to larger lots. The architecture, density, and lot sizes were discussed. Mr. Gonyea asked for direction on the cut through road to the east. Council and staff discussed the benefits and concerns with connectivity and overall maintenance. Council consensus is in favor of a small neighborhood park and additional trail connections. No formal action taken. ITEM 9: ACCESSORY STRUCTURE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT; ORD. 08-104, RES. NO. 2014-16 Community Development Director Klatt explained the ordinance amendment proposal. It is a minor amendment. Mr. Klatt pointed out the changes that staff recommends are different than what the Planning Commission formally recommended regarding the side entry garages. Council Member Bloyer asked about attached garages and why they are included in accessory use structures. Mr. Klatt stated that because attached garages are subordinate to the main structure. The attached garage is considered an accessory use but not an accessory structure. MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 08-104 AS AMENDED, REORGANIZING AND UPDATING THE CITY’S ACCESSORY STRUCTURE PROVISIONS