My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-2014 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
2010's
>
2014
>
04-15-2014 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/17/2025 8:24:24 PM
Creation date
7/31/2017 4:04:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 15, 2014 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br />Council Member Smith noted her concern with committing to the sewer without further development on the <br />eastern village. <br />Council discussed the sufficiency of the sewer pipe size. It was explained how this sewer will also provide the <br />option for potential relief for septic failures. <br />The council discussed how the city would fund the City portion if the City chooses to contribute. <br />Ms. Smith asked about the assessment if the development does not happen as quickly as expected. It was <br />explained that that the assessments happen regardless. <br />MOTION: Council Member Reeves moved TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2014-24, RECEIVING THE <br />FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING HEARING FOR THE 39TH STREET NORTH: <br />STREET AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. <br />Council Member Nelson is in favor of the city contributing to the street as they have already been assessed in <br />the past for streets. <br />Mayor Pearson asked if the appeals could be separated. Attorney Snyder explained that the court would look at the entire assessment and whether the benefit afforded outweighs the assessment. <br />The Council discussed the proposed sidewalk, trail, and related assessments, along with what portion, if any, the city should contribute to those items. It was agreed that he trail costs should come out of park dedication. <br />MOTION PASSED 5-0. <br />Council Member Smith requested a point of privilege at 9:24 pm. Council reconvened at 9:29 pm. <br />ITEM 10: LAKE ELMO AVENUE TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS – APPROVE <br />PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDER ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS; RES. NO. 2014- <br />25 <br />City Engineer Griffin provided overview of the project. It includes installation of watermain along Lake Elmo Avenue. Total estimated cost is $2,894,000. Post-design construction costs are estimated at $2,325,000. The <br />project will be paid through a combination of funds as follows: 1. Special Assessments – $185,600; 2. Water Enterprise Fund – $2,708,400. City Administrator Zuleger has negotiated secured funding for the project. Mr. Zuleger explained the status of the secured funding. Mr. Griffin explained the proposed project schedule. <br />Mayor Pearson asked how long the project cash-flows. It is estimated to be 6-7 years, but the structure is undetermined. <br />Council Member Reeves asked why the funding has been secured for Lake Elmo Avenue but not for Inwood <br />Avenue. Mr. Griffin explained the timing considerations involving the placement of the booster station and there is already temporary water provided by the City of Oakdale. <br />Council Member Nelson asked about the property service costs. Mr Griffin said that the bids will include that item, and the city will know at that point. <br />MOTION: Council Member Smith moved TO DENY RESOLUTION 2014-25. No second. MOTION <br />FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. <br />Council Member Smith stated that she needs more information. She wants the finances worked out before <br />approval. <br />MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2014-25, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR <br />THE LAKE ELMO AVENUE TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS. Council Member Nelson <br />seconded the motion.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.