Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />request was only $25K. He would be in favor of city contributing 1/3 if all the lakes were evenly supported. <br />He would like to have place holder in budget. Mr. Bloyer noted that recent letter from DNR found no natural <br />erosion occur this past spring. <br />Mr. Reeves believes the City should be engaged in treating the lakes, but he supports addressing all the lakes. <br />He also wants to know more info about the VBWD study. The outflow of the water was discussed. <br />It was noted that O/D levels are anticipated to increase. VBWD does not believe that increasing the outflow <br />can be achieved. <br />Mr. Zuleger explained the VBWD study. The consensus is to have a placeholder, but wait to hear study <br />findings. Mr. Zuleger suggested that the Council commit funds from the storm water fund as the lake is a <br />repository for storm water. Mr. Nelson wants to know if the watershed cities causing impact can be <br />approached for contribution. Mr. Zuleger said the City can ask the DNR. <br />Mr. Reeves asked if signage was sufficient. Mr. Zuleger said it was. It was noted that too much signage can <br />cause confusion. It was explained that the City has not participated in the past. <br />The Council discussed what the appropriate funding level and appropriate parties to pay. Council direction is <br />that the lake property owners need to propose a plan where the City can collaborate. The consequences of <br />using storm water funds were discussed. Future storm water expenses and needs are ahead for the Village <br />drainage. The Council wants to make sure that the expenses are effective and the results are measurable. <br />Ms. Bendel summarized the proposed debt service fund levy. <br />MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO APPROVE GENERAL FUND LEVY OF $2,421,588.00. Council Member Reeves seconded the motion. <br />The council acknowledged the tight budget that staff developed and the introduction of zero-based <br />budgeting. <br />MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br />MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO APPROVE DEBT SERVICE LEVY OF $484,814.00. Council Member Reeves seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br />The Council discussed how the library has done a good job of being frugal. Even with the 10% statutory <br />reduction, the library levy is still more than the requested budget. A 10% percent reduction results in a <br />$231,261.00. This is actually a 20% increase over the 2014 budget. <br />MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO APPROVE LIBRARY FUND BUDGET AND LEVY AT AMOUNT OF $231,261.00. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br />Mr. Zuleger clarified the resulting levy components – General Fund Levy: $2,421,588.00; G.O. Debt Levy: <br />$484,814.00; Library Levy: $231,261.00; total levy: $3,137,663.00. <br />MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2014-67 ADOPTING THE <br />PRELIMINARY 2015 GENERAL FUND AND LIBRARY FUND ANNUAL BUDGET’S AND LEVIES. Council Member Reeves seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br />ITEM 12: DISCUSSION ITEM: COUNCIL/STAFF INTERACTIONS <br />Mayor Pearson explained the reason for this item. Concerns about interactions with Council Member Smith <br />have been brought to the Council’s attention. Mayor Pearson noted that conversations were had and commitments to improve were made, but the incidents complained about allegedly have continued. The <br />immediate concerns are exposing the City to potential legal liability and the non-recognition of staff chain of command. The Mayor asked Council for their suggestions.