Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 7, 2015 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br />Griffin talked about the costs involved with the aesthetics of the building. It could cost as much as $30,000, <br />but landscaping could also be used. Eberhard stated that there would be less landscaping required if the <br />aesthetics of the building are better. <br />Mayor Pearson offered that $30,000 for aesthetic improvements seemed a bit excessive for that size building. <br />MOTION: Council Member Smith MOVED TO APPROVE THE INWOOD WATER BOOSTER <br />STATION LAND PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE A 90 FOOT BY 75 FOOT <br />PARCEL FROM THE CAROLINE MARY EBERHARD LIVING TRUST, (OPTION 1) Council <br />Member Bloyer seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 5-0. <br />ITEM 15: 2015 Bond Rating Report – Moody’s <br />Finance Director Bendel gave an update about the Moody’s Bond Rating Report. The City maintained the <br />Aa2 bond rating. <br />ITEM 16: Request from Verizon Wireless to Formally Address the Council – Ideal Ave. and Langley <br />Ct Sites –Lease Verizon is looking for approval from the Council to be able to build a new tower on the Langley court site <br />and would like to be able to negotiate with staff for lease agreements. Would possibly like to be able to build a new tower and lease to others or the City owning it and leasing it out. <br />Council supported looking to site these towers on City land so that they did not end up on private land. <br />Andrea Albright – Concerned about a 125 foot tower like this going up when telephone poles are being taken down for aesthetic reasons. <br />Paul Pallmeyer, Lake Jane Trail, a number of years ago T-mobile wanted to put up a tower by lake Jane. What is different about the proposal now? Smith stated that it came to them on the 90th day and they had to make a decision that night. She was opposed to putting it on private property vs. public land. <br /> MOTION: Council Member Pearson moved TO authorize staff to negotiate lease agreements with Verizon <br />Wireless Communications for the Ideal Avenue and Langley Court water tower sites with <br />consideration of City owned tower. Council Member Fliflet seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 5-0 <br />ITEM 17: Request to Fund Services for Code Enforcement Case Staff is asking for approval for a survey to be done to determine if code enforcement is warranted on a <br />property in the Tri-lake area. <br />MOTION: Council Member Lundgren moved TO. Authorize the requested survey work related to ongoing <br />code enforcement activities in an amount not to exceed $1500 Pearson seconded the motion. MOTION <br />PASSED 5-0. <br />ITEM 18: CITY CLERK SEVERENCE REQUEST <br />MOTION: Council Member Bloyer moved TO APPROVE CITY CLERK SEVERENCE REQUEST. Council Member Pearson seconded the motion. MOTION FAILS 2-3. (Fliflet, Lundgren, Smith –Nay) <br />ITEM 19: COUNCIL MEETING DECORUM This would give the City Council, Commissioners, Staff and Residents guidelines for meeting decorum. <br />There was opposition to some of the wording. <br />Dale Dorschner, 3150 Lake Elmo Ave, feels this is ironic after the first meeting when Speak your Peace was <br />taken down. He feels that when decisions are made, reasons should be given.