05-17-2005 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

What’s going to happen to the access to 36 per Dillerud. Reasonable flow to 36 and it need not be a straight shot. Tim freeman putmen, mick Lynsky Would like to have the city extend water to them. And be on a level playing field like all the other developers under construction. Mark Putman Landscape Architect, summarized the landscape plan and Drawing from mndot…30’m easement on the propertyline, proposing didn’t want to straighten the street out, e w ciorrdior dducated corridor now, DeLapp wants freeway more traffic at 45 mph than you can at 70 mph. don’t need st traffic going thru le. Elimijate houses for 50% op. by placing the easement we are welcoming mndot to come in. don’t neee a street on both sides of the freeway. Tired of paying for lights for traffic from st and loosing our natural resources. The issue of the land trust, con servation easement, 2/3 op be protecte4d, reforestation plan under power lines be providedl, no exterior lighting be shown except for private property mechanism less inrusive sets houses ijn wooded areas, provide 200’ buffer on water bodies, direct them minimum st widths as possible to save vegetation as much as possible and slow trffice and maintain character that is not ike our farm fields, brig be minimal immapt as possible, picnic area with shelter, deestitions to walk to…ideas Dillerud appreiddates ste4ves concerns. Prudent to anticipate the need to someday accomodate4 something like that. Connection e to w on this property. That street shown should be more improved than shown. Does this alternative provides the same answer bring traffic from one side of the pat to the other. Dillerud said Steve ideas are good but are judgment calls. The pz discussed that bridge at length and thought it was a bit much, and he felt it was a bit much. Eagle point dealt with bridges should be looked at. Street lights should not be there at all. See the mn land trust to find out what they would accept or not. Condition #5 Steve has objected to it. Could add steves memo to resolution as guidance. Freeman this dev is going way beyond what the ordinane requires. Unfair. Land trust esement or we will not be approved. City had held easements. Problem with heaping things on, nitpick with all the things we did on the plan. M/S/P Johnston/Johnson to adopt resolution no2005-47, (Motion passed3-1DeLapp will be fine… DeLapp if the land set aside by the power lines,k if the road was but woud it be over 50o% op..yes, strong history of never requiring a county or steal Motion to limit the debate Johnston/johnson Motion passed 3-1DeLapp wsanted to Amend item #5