Laserfiche WebLink
Amend motion to request dev look into a possibility of a qualififed land trust easement <br />Smith/Johnston. Motion passed 4-0 <br /> B. CDBG – Amended Contract for Cimarron Gas Service Project:Resolution No. <br />2005-049 <br />M/S/P adopt Resoluton o. 2005- Johnson/Smith. (Motion passed 4-0). <br />Thanked Chuck per Smith came through with a fabujlous proposals and coming up with <br />the money <br /> C. Site Plan Amendment:11051 Stillwater Boulevard:Resolution No. 2005-048 <br />2005-045 <br /> <br />M/S/P approving an amended site plan for 11051 Stillwater Bvd. per plans staff <br />dated May6 Brick with cedar accidents, corrugated roofing <br />new site plan comply with archite4ctural guidelines. <br />DeLapp Is the sign grandfathered in…Dillerud as long as they don’t move the structure. <br />Add 5th condition Johnston/Johnson that roofing material not be corrugated. <br />Plan was not done by an architect but Meyer, has to have a registration stamp, plan stamping against state law. <br />Provisiaol that proper ………Motion passed 4-0. <br /> <br /> D. Central Water and Sewer Service In OP Developments <br />Delapp suggest4ed having cindy weckworh from wash cty to come and tlk to us. Johnsto asked if there is a sense of urgecy.l facig op dev coming thru the door and have ord in palce, <br /> <br />Ask staff to get started and have cindy weckworth to come to the next meeting. <br /> M/S/P Johnson/Smitgh - to direct staff to pursue ord to support recommendation and ask to get additional information from weckworth. (Motion passed 4-0). <br /> <br /> E. Dupuis/Engstrom Minor Subdivision- Amended <br /> M/S/P DElAPP/Johnson adopt RESolution 2005-050. (Motion passed 4-0). <br /> <br />Persons per Volume <br />Johnston its not the time to be talking about rattling sabers. If we don’t get 2.91 pproved <br />we will get 2.53. constitue our negation tam and go back to met co rather than take the confrontational approach. <br />Delapp we in MOU chose the thype of housing the met co doesn’t askingless occpany <br />than woodbury does. Jhnsto the suporemt cut defidions stted whether we agree or not. <br />DeLapp apparent misunderstanding le will deermine housing in the city. <br />Smith have staff to look into this revisit it at a special meeting <br />Consensu no one want to look at it.