Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 6, 2004 6 <br />8. CITY ENGINEER’S REPORT: <br /> A. Receive quotes for 34th Street Lift Station Repair <br /> <br />In his memo dated April 1, 2004, the City Engineer reported he received four quotes for the 34th Street Lift Station Repair project. This project was included in the City’s 2004 <br />CIP for an estimated cost of $10,000. The City Engineer’s estimate was low. <br /> <br />M/S/P Dunn/Johnston - to award the contract for the 34th Street Lift Station Repair to <br />Meyer Contracting in the amount of $18,700.00, per the City Engineer’s memo dated April 1, 2004. (Motion passed 5-0). 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: <br /> A. Site Plan Amendment and Temporary Office – Hiner Development <br /> At it’s meeting of March 29, 2004, the Planning Commission recommended approval of an amendment to the Mulligan Master Site Plan; and, also recommended that Hiner <br />Development be granted permission to place a portable structure on the site during the <br />2004 season. <br /> The City Planner reported the site plan amendment rearranges the location of structures on the site; and, adjusts the sizes/uses of those structures. The request for a temporary <br />structure is to enable the otherwise essentially complete facility to open for business <br />while the permanent structures are under construction. <br /> M/S/P Johnston/Siedow - to adopt Resolution No. 2004-026 approving amendments to the Hiner Development Site Plan, per plans staff-dated March 25, 2004, as recommended <br />by the Planning Commission. (Motion passed 5-0.) <br /> <br />M/S/P Johnston/Siedow – to approve the location of a temporary structure on the Mulligan Masters site per plans staff-dated March 25, 2004, and subject to the condition that the temporary structure be removed by October 31, 2004. (Motion passed 5-0). <br /> <br />C. Zoning Variance – Eisele, 11094 35th Street N <br /> The City Planner reported at its meeting of March 29, 2004, the Planning Commission <br />held a public hearing and recommended for approval the variance application to construct <br />a garage that would encroach on both front and side yard required setbacks. The <br />Planning Commission recommendation was subject to three conditions, the garage <br />structure be reduced in size and/or its location be adjusted to result I not less than a 6 foot setback to the side property line and not less than a 20 foot front setback. This condition <br />would reduce the width of the garage from 32 feet to 28 feet; and reduce the depth of the <br />garage from 24/26 feet to 22/24 feet. The increased side setback could be accomplished <br />by sliding the garage northerly 2 feet. The Commission did not specify garage <br />dimensions, but rather maximum setback variances. The Commission recommended a slight modification to the staff-recommended condition regarding a 5 foot driveway <br />setback.