April 18, 2006 CCP - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Amended/Approved: 4/10/06 City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 27, 2006 Chairman Helwig called to order the meeting of the Lake Elmo Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Fliflet, Park, Van Zandt, Deziel, Roth, Schneider, Armstrong, Pelletier. STAFF PRESENT: Planner Dillerud, Administrator Rafferty, and Recording Secretary Anez. Agenda M/S/P, Pelletier/Van Zandt to accept the agenda as presented. Vote: 9:0. Minutes of February 27, 2006 Commissioner Fliflet page two halfway down the page, it should say Home Office. Commissioner Pelletier page one nay vote last sentence only Pelletier stated... Page three crazy to try to regulate Avon and those types of home parties -delete it. M/S/P, Fliflet/Van Zandt to approve as amended. Vote: 7:0:2, Abstain: Roth and Schneider: Absent. Minutes of March 13, 2006 Commissioner Fliflet page three motion to remove number six. Limit the number of hours not lateness of hours. M/S/P, RodiTliflet to approve the Minutes of March 13, 2006 as amended. Vote: 7:0:2, Abstain: Armstrong and Pelletier: Absent. M/S/P, Fliflet/Schneider to ask Council for clarification about why they would not want to read commentary and discussion points on planning issues. Administrator Rafferty said staff will bring guidelines for the agenda to the next meeting. Vote: 9:0. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat, Development Stage Plan and Conditional Use Permit for HIDDEN MEADOWS OF LAKE ELMO (Formerly known as Deer Glen) The Planner said the applicant has submitted two related applications on a 108.62 acre site at Keats and Highway 36. The preliminary plat is for a 68 acre portion of the 108 acres. The balance of the site has been previously preliminarily platted including the church site, the homestead site, and the roadway. Staff observed the preliminary plat essentially responds to the Concept Plan layout as approved. The Landscape Plan for the project is responsive to the OP Ordinance and Section 400 Subdivision requirements. Condition Number 5 for the east property line appears to have an existing tree line substituting for the 200 feet buffer. The City is looking for cross -sections to demonstrate the effectiveness of that buffer. The City Engineer indicates a number of items in an e-mail memo dated March 23, 2006, where there was not enough information provided by the applicant for him to finish a review. Staff recommends waiting for that supplemental information because of their number. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 27, 2006