Laserfiche WebLink
Minnesota DNR and the Valley Branch Watershed have been asked to comment on the <br />application. Valley Branch has responded by a letter of February 1 with no objections to the <br />variances, but with several recommendations regarding erosion control and run-off mitigation. No <br />response has been received from DNR as of this writing. <br />Findings and Recommendations: <br />The requested variance regarding OHW setback appears to respond favorably to the required <br />variance findings — if structure scale is considered to be mitigated by the existing forestry on the <br />site. A reduction in the degree of OHW encroachment represented by the proposed structure from <br />that existing with the house to be razed along with conformity with the averaged setbacks of the <br />adjoining structures appears to support OHW setback variance approval. Moving the structure <br />further west on the site by as little as 10 feet will place it in the OHW setback of Olson Lake to the <br />west — a unique physical circumstance. <br />The concern of staff regarding this application goes to the construction of a new residence on a <br />parcel clearly non -conforming by area — the second variance. The City-wide ramifications of <br />approval of this variance will be significant without Findings that are carefully structured to <br />overcome precedent that would undermine the zoning ordinance. Staff continues to work with the <br />City Attorney toward properly worded findings regarding the parcel area variance. We are <br />publishing this staff report pending those findings to enable timely completion of the February 13 <br />Commission packet. <br />With respect to the OHW setback variance only, we suggest the following findings: <br />1. The property can not be put to reasonable use without the granting of the variance <br />requested. The variance is the minimum possible given the unique circumstances of the <br />parcel essentially "fronting" two lakes. <br />2. The variance requested results from circumstances unique to this property platted prior to <br />the adoption of Shoreland Regulations by the City resulting in OHW setback applicable <br />from two lake frontages; and, the circumstances of the variance were not solely created by <br />the applicant. <br />3. Granting of the variance will not change the essential character of the neighborhood. <br />We therefore recommend approval of the OHW setback variance only (at this time) upon the <br />following conditions: <br />1. Compliance with the Valley Branch Watershed District recommendations regarding silt <br />fence erosion control and installation of rain gutters directed away from Lake <br />Demontreville. <br />2. Compliance with any recommendations of the City Forester regarding protection of the <br />existing forestry on the site during construction <br />Staff will report to the Commission on February 13 regarding recommendations and findings <br />regarding the non -conforming lot area variance. <br />