Laserfiche WebLink
1ST DRAFT <br />Pastor Michael Friend requested that the zoning remain as it was changed to in 1989 <br />(PF), and explained the circumstances regarding the church building delay. <br />Council discussions determined that since there was no sense of urgency, the Pastor be <br />allowed to return in 30 days, when a full Council is present to hear the church's plans. <br />M/S/P Smith/Johnson — to table Resolution No. 2006-071, and Ordinance 97-176, and <br />bring back to the August 18, 2006, City Council meeting. (Motion passed 4-0) <br />C. Home Office / Home Based Business: Ordinances postponed: <br />M/S/P Johnson/Johnston — to direct Staff to bring back after Litigation is resolved. <br />(Motion passed 4-0) <br />All- <br />D. Park Meadows —Extension of Final Plat, Resolution 2006171: <br />The City Planner informed City Council that the developer of the Park Meadows <br />subdivision failed to record the Final document with the 120 days as prescribed by the <br />Subdivision Ordinance, and therefore the City's approv,:;of the plat has expired. He <br />noted that Staff is convinced this was merely an oversight on the part ofe developer <br />and recommended adoption of the Resolution, theTS insuriirg continued compliance <br />with the City Code. <br />M/S/P Conlin/Johnson — to adopt Re <br />of the Park Meadows Plat. (Motion <br />E. Park and Ride: <br />The City Planner requested <br />location. He reported that < <br />Transit regarding the propo <br />was again discussed.atte <br />to place the matter on the Ji <br />the Final Plat <br />about the Keats Avenue Park & Ride <br />,ctirig Staff to continue discussions with Metro <br />pass at an earlier Council meeting. The matter <br />i, Council Workshop session, and staff was asked <br />;,Council agenda to be again considered. <br />M/S/P Johnston/Johnson — to direct Staff to continue discussions with Met Council <br />regarding the Metro Transit prd sal to construct a Park & Ride in Lake Elmo seeking <br />additional information, ai a various options that could potentially make such a facility <br />more acceptable to the City. (Motion 4-0) <br />F. Accessory Building in AG — Zoning Interpretation: <br />M/S/P Johnson/Johnston — to direct Staff to bring back after Litigation is resolved. <br />(Motion passed 4-0) <br />10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: <br />Litigation was scheduled for Wednesday at 1:00 p.m. <br />11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: None <br />12. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS AND REPORTS: <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 5, 2006 <br />