My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
December 5, 2006 CCP
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
2000's
>
2006
>
December 5, 2006 CCP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2025 11:54:41 AM
Creation date
10/1/2019 3:19:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Drainage <br />The applicant shall receive SW" approval for this project prior to approval by the City. The <br />proposed development is in keeping with the overall site grading and drainage plan for this <br />subdivision. Some SWWD standards have changed since this area was first proposed. The <br />developer is complying with these revised rules by adding infiltration areas as part of the storm <br />sewer system. <br />DNR approval is also needed for work within the protected waters. <br />Sanitary Sewer. <br />This building will be served by municipal sewer previously install by the developer. A private fl- <br />inch sanitary sewer service will be extended from the public sewer to the building. Connection to <br />the City infrastructure shall be inspected by the City Engineer. <br />Watermain <br />An 8-inch watermain will be extended to the building from the public watermain along Inwood <br />Avenue. The Fire Chief should review and approve hydrant placement around the building. A <br />marker sign is required at all valves not in the street. <br />The private watermain shall be designed so that that it can be looped back to a public watermain <br />when Lot 1 is developed. <br />Easements <br />The drainage easement along the east property line should be enlarged to encompass the stream <br />and the existing pond. <br />DNR Review <br />The DNR has reviewed the materials for the Eagle Point Business Park 71h Addition. There is disagreement <br />between the applicant and the DNR on the setbacks from the watercourse. This issue will be further <br />researched by staff and discussed with both the applicant and the DNR in an attempt to clarify the setback <br />location. <br />Lighting <br />No exterior lighting plan has been submitted, but the developer has indicated in the cover letter that the <br />exterior lighting will be shoebox (90 degree cutoff) style on 25 foot standards consistent with those in other <br />developments at Eagle Point Business Park, which should comply with the City's lighting standards. A <br />complete illumination graphic will be required to ensure at -grade foot candle compliance prior to building <br />permit issuance. <br />The City Code requires 160 parking spaces. The applicant's graphics include 190 off-street parking. The <br />PUD Plan -required 10 foot side yard parking setback is maintained on the subject site so no such <br />demonstration is necessary. <br />Landscape Plan <br />The City Forester has provided a review of the application: <br />"I have reviewed the landscape plan for the Eagle Point III office park, dated 10/26/06. The <br />general concept and design are attractive and suit the site and purpose of the project. The plant list <br />is good, consisting of hardy, attractive plants which require little maintenance. Swamp white oak <br />is specified to be planted in several of the parking lot medians and I question whether there will be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.