Laserfiche WebLink
Lake Elmo <br />Agenda Section: Planning, band Use and Zoning <br />No. 9A <br />City Council <br />February 21, <br />2006 <br />A ends Item: Amended Development Agreement — Sanctuary of Lake Elmo <br />Background Information for February 21, 2006: <br />The Final Plat and Development Agreement for the Sanctuary project was originally approved by the City <br />Council on December 6, 2005. Since that action, an issue regarding the design of the Manning/Highway 36 <br />intersection has been raised by both MnDOT and Washington County that could result in a much more <br />elaborate and costly improvement that first assumed. The City Engineer has estimated the cost if those <br />improvements to be $150,000. The Council will be requested to approve preparation by the City Engineer <br />of a Feasibility Study regarding the improvements in coming weeks. That work will address the scale of <br />work, the cost of work, staging, and financial options. A decision by the City as to whether to construct <br />those improvements — or the standard City street section — will be based on that Feasibility Study. <br />The City Attorney has prepared a new Paragraph 4.12 for the Sanctuary Development Agreement that <br />establishes an escrow requirement for the developer for what we now assume to be 50% of the enhanced <br />street section costs should the City decide to proceed with that enhanced street section in 2006 as a City <br />project. The northerly 700 feet (approximately) of Manning as it approaches Highway 36 will continue <br />with the simple one lift asphalt mat that the developer has already installed until that decision is rendered by <br />the City Council. <br />Since this enhanced Manning improvement would be a City project if it proceeds, the City Attorney has <br />advised that the new Paragraph 4.12 must be approved in an amendment Contract by the City Council. We <br />have also updated all of the improvement costs, security requirements, and Administrative Fee to reflect the <br />developers actual improvement costs for that work already completed. A slightly higher Administrative Fee <br />to the City, but a slightly lower Engineering Inspection Fee (based on actual TKDA invoices to the City) <br />results. There have been no other modifications of consequence to the Agreement from the version <br />approved on December 6. <br />Person responsible: <br />Action items: Oaf <br />re <br />Motion to adopt Resolution #2006 — approving an amended <br />C.ty <br />i` <br />Development Agreement for the Sanctuary of Lake Elmo. <br />Attachments: O�-:;) <br />Time Allocated: <br />1. Draft Resolution #2006 — Approving Amended <br />Development Agreement <br />2. Amended Development Agreement <br />