February 21, 2006 CCP - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DRAFT Councilmember DeLapp said he agrees but one of the issues on lakes is for protection. Everyone will be well aware of this building because it will sit so high. Part of the approval is the applicant should meet the new building and site requirements of the VBWD for buffers and tree plantings in order to reduce its impact on the lake. The Planner said we are mandated to have a Shoreland Ordinance by state statute and their may be little than can be done in the Tri-Lakes area due to those rules. M/S/P, Johnston/Conlin to adopt Resolution 2006-017 approving a variance to Shoreland OHW Setback at 4473 Olson Lake Trail per plans staff dated February 3, 2006, and per the recommendation and findings of the Planning Commission. Councilmember DeLapp asked for an Amendment to the Motion that the applicant develop their land between building and waters edge in concurrence with state rules and VBWD recommendations particularly with regard to buffers. MOTION TO AMEND WITHDRAWN. Councilmember Johnson asked if we can require these conditions city can attach reasonable conditions to approval of a variance rec Mr. Flanagan, the applicant, said there are huge trees and house is one of the few on the lake that is screened so wei VOTE: 5:0 PASSED. The Planner said if the City had landscaping Standards to Council Workshop. MOVED 11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S A. Proposed Joint Park with O x The Administrator explains 'I 26 acre site being donated y 3M representatives would nice' bf di Mayor Johnston said the idea r public. Parking, safety, lights, The City Attorney said the and the lake. His easy to enforce. Add Landscaping )posed joint park with Oakdale for youth playfnelds on a proposal currently sits at the point where the cities' and issues worked out before bringing it before the , and other issues must first be addressed. Councilmember Conlin said she is opposed to the park. If we authorize the Letter of Understanding to explore a Joint Powers Agreement that is a step into a process and an investment of time and money that is hard to abandon after six months or so of study. The document before the Council is complex. There will be a groundswell of opposition by the public. We should do the conceptual work on whether this is the right location for this sort of park. Councilmember DeLapp said we should be allowed to reduce our RECs and population and asked where the water is going to come from due to the pollution. Surface water runoff will go right into Raleigh Creek from heavily fertilized playfields where it will ultimately end up in the St. Croix River. Is the whole park going to be fully developed? Lighting is a concern, especially for youth. Will there be shelter there? Restrooms? What kind of buildings, maintenance equipment, speakers, what will the limits be? Lake Elmo City Council Meeting Minutes of February 7, 2006 6