Laserfiche WebLink
the property owners' construction firm and inspected and maintained by the City. The C tyAFp <br />Engineer would work with the owners' engineer with regard to some mechanical functions. <br />Regardless of cost, it would be the responsibility of the <br />then turn it over to the City, property owners to pay the costs and <br />Councilmember Conlin asked if there was an analysis done to charge the sam <br />Systems. She suggested taking a look at what the appropriate e as for the 201 amount will be for maintaining <br />this system after construction if it goes forward. The Planner said Superintendent Bouthilet <br />can look at it. <br />M/S/P, Johnson/Johnston, To approve the plan for wastewater treatment to serve the Austad, <br />Pierre, and Hurt properties per plans staff dated January 12, 2006 subject to the <br />recommendations of the City Forester (landscape screening) and the City Engineer (system <br />design). The property owners will pay the entire cost of the system and City construction <br />inspection costs, and agree to pay City wastewater fees in an amount to be determined and in <br />water systems, conditional <br />the same manner as properties connected to the City's 201 waste upon a written agreement with the property owners and the City prior commencement with <br />construction. <br />The Administrator said the owners will not have to pay for the use of the park land. <br />Councilmember DeLapp said they should have to pay whatever the land is worth. <br />Councilmember Smith said she thinks these property owners were unsuspecting victims. Now <br />we are trying to solve a problem in the best way possible without getting Oakdale sewer. <br />Rave Austad <br />Mr. Austad said they did not know the problem with the land when they bought it. The <br />Council could have gotten the other land by eminent domain but they didn't do it. At some <br />point he and his neighbors are going to run out of money.. This plan is more costly than going <br />to Oakdale for sewer. <br />Councilmember DeLapp said they should get rid of the mounds in the front yards to bring <br />them back into the character of the neighborhood. <br />Mr. Austad said MN Rule 7080 says they have to follow rules for abandonment of a septic <br />system. If it costs $50,000 to change the yard, they may not be able to do it. <br />The Mayor asked the City Attorney whether they could include a land charge and forgive it in <br />the future. Mr. Austad would not object. <br />Councilmember DeLapp said that part of the cost was land acquisition when we built 201's. <br />We should incorporate the park land into the costs here. In the event the lawsuit is successful, <br />the damages could be incorporated. Mr. Rooney, Mr. Austad's attorney, said they cannot <br />contrive to add fees to this lawsuit. Provisional costs would complicate the situation. <br />Councilmember Conlin called the question. VOTE: 4:1 Nay-DeLapp. <br />The City Attorney will come back with the agreement for Council review and approval prior to <br />construction. <br />Lake Elmo City Council Minutes of January 17, 2006 <br />