Laserfiche WebLink
v _Li -u 413) (�-00 APPROVED: 2/27/06 <br />Mr. Moore said he is not opposed to the applicant subdividing the property, but objects to size of <br />lots on a concept plan he received, and feels the applicant could do a better job on the layout <br />without impacting wetlands and the drainage ditch. He said there is an eroded ditch leading into <br />a culvert that goes under County Road 6, and a holding pond should be placed there for sediment <br />control where the water goes under Stillwater Boulevard, and trees should be preserved. They <br />are old trees. Some have wind damage but there is not much oak wilt in that area. He walked <br />the site last week. The layout could be improved for aesthetics and erosion control due to runoff <br />of the water. That water drains into Lake Elmo Park Reserve. His lot is just south of Raleigh <br />Creek and this parcel. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 8:24 P.M. <br />Commissioner Armstrong said that SRD Guiding in the Comprehensive Plan was basically used <br />for existing neighborhoods back in the 1980's with the attitude that they are great neighborhoods <br />but we cannot duplicate them due to septic systems and other problems. The City developed a <br />method for devising SRD Guidings based on five criteria that had to be met before parcels could <br />be rezoned. Perhaps this parcel could go to RED but SRD is absolutely inappropriate for this <br />site. <br />Commissioner Deziel said the water pollution does seem to be a change in condition. He asked <br />the Planner's opinion. <br />The Planner said the water will be taken care of in less than one year and does not constitute a <br />change in conditions that would support a Comp Plan amendment. He also noted that a variance <br />for minimum plat are would be required to go to RE Zoning. <br />M/S/P, Ptacek/Armstrong to recommend denial of the.application to amend the Comprehensive <br />Plan and rezone this parcel 8740 Stillwater Boulevard to SRD and R-1 based on the findings <br />suggested by City Staff. <br />Commissioner Deziel said he does not see an error to the Comprehensive Plan. RED guiding <br />might get some sympathy with the Plarming Commission. The density of R-1 doesn't comply <br />with neighboring densities. <br />PASSED: 9:0. <br />The Chairman recessed the meeting at 8:31 p.m. and reconvened at 8:39 p.m. <br />Amend Uses in GB Zone to Allow a Drive -up Window <br />The Planner said he wants to be sure the Commission approves what text changes have been <br />made for permitted and conditional use. He will publish immediately following this meeting <br />when a final draft of the Code is determined. <br />Commissioner Armstrong said his concern is that a drive -up window should be tied into an <br />existing sit down restaurant so a coffee shack would not be allowed in the future. "Attached only <br />to a sit down restaurant." <br />In that case the Planner said he would define restaurants differently. <br />Commissioner Pelletier asked if someone can do a carside to go or a walk-up window without it <br />