Laserfiche WebLink
The City has requested a further extension of the submission date for the Comp Plan update to the Metro <br />Council and approved by the Board on June 28`h. Dillerud asked the Council to set up a workshop to go <br />over these elements in detail, with a goal of adopting this or some similar version of these elements. <br />Council comments should be submitted to the Planner. <br />M/S/P Armstrong/Dunn — to receive this Comp Plan Elements from the Planning Commission and direct <br />the staff to set up workshop to go over these elements in detail, with a goal of adopting this or some similar <br />version of these elements as soon as possible to enable work to progress on the remaining details. (Motion <br />passed 5-0). <br />10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: <br />A. Ordinance Relating to Non -Agricultural Low Impact Uses in Agricultural/Zoning District <br />At the City Attorney's suggestion at the June 20`h meeting, the ordinance was put into proper form <br />consistent with our current City Code. There have been no changes to the intent of the ordinance, but <br />clarifications made. Definitions are needed for Nature Farms, Agricultural Museums and Small engine <br />repair shops. <br />The City Administrator suggested doing an inventory of the existing Conditional Use Permits and <br />determine what may be non -conforming upon adoption of this ordinance, so the records are clear. In the <br />past, Council member DeLapp has reminded the City that Washington County sets a length of time for <br />CUP'S. <br />11. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: <br />Council member DeLapp called the city assessor, Frank Langer, about Stillwater Investment/Arkell <br />property and was informed that the assumption was based on purchased price with continuation of Bob <br />Engstrom's development. DeLapp said that he believes the City has lost thousands in park dedication fees. <br />Council member Dunn asked the staff to review these numbers. <br />Council asked SRD to be sent back to the Planning Commission for review. <br />Council member Siedow reported they are repaving runways at the Lake Elmo Airport. <br />12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: <br />13. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />A. Comments on proposed VBWD Amendments <br />In response to the Valley Branch Watershed's 2000 Draft Plan Amendment, staff was directed to engage in <br />whatever use necessary to report to VBWD. Administrator Kueffner supported the position of the <br />Washington County Board of Managers to consider postponing this Plan amendment until all other possible <br />solutions are seriously considered. It was pointed out that BOWSR, Washington County Soil and Water <br />Conservation, Baytown Township all thought the plan amendment was an "overkill" for the problem. <br />M/S/P DeLapp/Dunn — to transfer the Administrator's letter to the VBWD supporting the position of <br />Washington County. (Motion passed 5-0.) <br />B. Resolution clarifying Year 2000 Fee Schedule <br />WAC charges are $1600 per sac unit and will be added to the fee schedule adopted for 2000. <br />M/S/P DeLapp/Armstrong — to adopt Resolution No. 2000-027, amending the 2000 Fee Schedule to <br />include the WAC charge of $16000 per sac unit. (Motion passed 5-0) <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 18, 2000 % <br />