Laserfiche WebLink
Tim Freeman pointed out the parcel of property next to Cardinal Ridge will <br />not meet the 3 to 1 ratio aspect if this ordinance is adopted. In his view the <br />flexibility has been deleted in the ordinance. Now, you would have to come <br />and ask for a variance, which requires a hardship. <br />M/S/P Armstrong/DeLapp - to Strike item 2g. Constructed storm water <br />retention ponding shall not be located in the preserved Open Space because <br />ponding would be a beautiful asset for open space. -(Motion passed 5-0.) <br />Attorney Filla informed the Council if it wanted to take action on the <br />ordinance prepared, they could take a date for future. <br />MIS/P Armstrong/Dunn - to approve Ordinance 9774 and make effective <br />March 8th <br />Council member Siedow made the following motion because the setback for <br />buffer was changed: <br />M/S/F Siedow/Hunt - page 6 & 7, E2 put back setbacks the way they were <br />and not what the PZ has proposed. (Motion failed 2-3. Dunn, Armstrong, <br />DeLapp). <br />M/S/P DeLapp/Dunn — to adopt amendment to Lot Design: 1. Add <br />terms..... if individual septic systems are to be included. (Motion passed 4- <br />1:Armstrong.) <br />M/S/P DeLapp/Hunt — to adopt amendment on page 6, Item 2. When Ag <br />uses are proposed to be retained. (Motion passed 5-0.) <br />Council member Dunn explained she just looked at changes in red and not <br />reviewed the entire document. Planner Dillerud has done exactly what the <br />Council wanted him to do. <br />M/S/P DeLapp/Siedow - to postpone motion on table to a workshop on <br />Tuesday, February 27U', 5:00, with lunch provided. (Motion passed 4- <br />1:Armstorng lilted her motion.) <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 6, 2001 8 <br />