Laserfiche WebLink
this development. Park Dedication requirements were satisfied for this plat with the <br />Fields of St.Croix 2A Addition Development Agreement — Tana Park. <br />The Planner reported that the Council has previously approved a request by the developer <br />to receive a building permit for the first building — two units. This building is already <br />under construction. <br />M/S/P DeLapp/Siedow - to adopt Resolution No. 2002-134, A Resolution approving the <br />Final Plat and Development Agreement for Bluestem at Fields of St. Croix, based on <br />compliance of the plan with the approved Preliminary Plat, and the provision of Section <br />400 of the City Code; and, subject to conditions of compliance with the recommendations <br />of the City Engineer and City Attorney. (Motion passed 4-1: Armstrong: The <br />development is too dense.). <br />Escrow Reduction for Little B1ueStem at the Fields <br />The City Engineer recommended the escrow be reduced. The Administrative fees have <br />not been paid. <br />Original Cost <br />Remaining Cost <br />Site Grading/Turf Establishment <br />$ 39,396.00 <br />$ <br />5,000.00 <br />Storm Sewer <br />13,919.00 <br />2,500.00 <br />Watermain <br />25,871.00 <br />5,000.00 <br />Streets <br />33,246.00 <br />25,000.00 <br />Street Signs <br />500.00 <br />15,000.00 <br />Landscaping <br />10,000.00 <br />10,000.00 <br />Subtotal <br />$122,932.00 <br />$ <br />62,500.00 <br />125% Security <br />$153,665.00 <br />$ <br />78,125.00 <br />2% City Administrative Fee <br />$ 2,458.64 <br />$ <br />Paid <br />M/S/P Durm/Siedow — to approve the reduction of the Little Blue Stem at the Fields <br />Development Agreement to $78,125.00, noting that the administrative fees have not been <br />paid, as recommended by the City Engineer in his memo dated November 5, 2002. <br />(Motion passed 4-1: Armstrong). <br />B. Zoning Variance: Eric Svendsen, 10920 32°d Street <br />Eric Svendsen, 10920 32Id Street, is proposing to construct a new garage at the same <br />front setback line as the old garage. That location requires a variance from the 30 foot R- <br />1 front setback standard, as well as Council approval for locating an accessory structure <br />closer to a public street than the principal structure. The new garage is proposed to be <br />same width (34 feet) as is reported for the old garage, but is proposed to be 4 feet deeper <br />(24 feet, rather the previous 20 feet). <br />LAKE ELMO COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 19, 2002 <br />