Laserfiche WebLink
R-75-! a <br />RESOLUTION <br />CITY OF LAKE ELMO <br />WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />A RESOLUTION RELATING TO EVALUATION OF I-94 <br />ALTERNATE ROUTES <br />WHEREAS, the I-94 Management Committee by its letter of December <br />16, 1974, has asked the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo for <br />its evaluation of the alternate routes for the proposed Inter -state <br />Highway No. 94; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo has considered <br />these alternate routes for sometime as the various proposals relate to <br />planning and development within the City of Lake Elmo; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Council has most recently considered the position <br />of the Washington County Board of Commissioners with respect to proposed <br />alternate routes, <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following statementsbe and <br />the same are hereby the determinations and recommendations of the City <br />Council of the City of Lake Elmo to be submitted to said I-94 Manage- <br />ment Committee for the purpose of aiding said Committee in evaluating <br />the alternate routes proposed for Inter -State Highway 94: <br />1. The I-94 Management Committee has asked: <br />"Identify specific areas and/or items of interest to your <br />community which you feel would be either beneficially or <br />adversely affected by either alternate." <br />RESPONSE <br />As to Alternate I, the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo <br />determines that selection of Alternate I would benefit the City of <br />Lake Elmo for the following reasons: <br />(a) The County Road 80 interchange is beneficial both <br />as a connector for old Trunk)Highway 12 and for C.R. <br />80 itself. C.R. 80 is proposed to become a major <br />north -south corridor serving western Washington County. <br />It is also recommended that sufficient right-of-way be <br />required and allowance be made for future cloverleaf at <br />C.R. 80 - 94 intersection. It is recommended that "free - <br />flow" traffic provisions be designed in the ramp inter- <br />section and the T.H. 12 intersection with C. R. 80. <br />(b) The County Road 19B interchange is necessary to pro- <br />vide access to the regional park now under development. <br />In addition, this interchange will serve proposed develop- <br />ment in Woodbury and Lake Elmo including the Dayton -Hudson <br />regional center. <br />(c) The proposed intersection at County Road 15 will <br />permit allowance for an acquisition of sufficient right- <br />