05-20-80 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LAKE LZ240 CITY COUNCIL MEETING, MAY 209 1980 -2- MRS, RYAN: Inquired about the "junk" problem next to her home. The Building Inspector has sent a letter to Mr. Malone, and he has 30 days to clean up the area - or the City will take legal action. She also asked about open pumping of a septic system. The Administrator stated the Nuisance Ordinance prohibits this. Ryan's should contact the Building Inspector and/or Sewer Inspector to verify this when it is being done; the City can then issue a complaint. The Ryan's can also individually sign a complaint against the offender. They also expressed concern about the problems caused -by additional boat trafficedue to the access on Lake DeMontreville. Armstrong stated -the Sheriff will come out and utilize a residents boat when violations occur. TKDA. PEE - MAINTENANCE BUILDING: The Councils feels the greater portion of the $$59200 cost over -run should be absorbed by TKDA. As professionals, it is their responsibility to know the financial limitations of the client, and work within those limitations. Mottaz moved, seconded by Pott, to pay 209/6 of TKDA's $$4,284.18 architect fee. Motion carried 3-0-1. Novak abstained. Lake Elmo has already paid over $$19000 previously billed for architectural fees on this building. CLEAN UP DAYS: The scrap houling proved a worthwhile idea. Hours and identification of Lake Elmo residents posed the only minor problems. Longer hours, or Friday night hours will be considered for the next clean-up. Methods of identification also to be contemplated. All -in -all Clean -Up Days went smoothly. BROCKMAN LICERSE: Mr. Brockman appealed the denial of his license to operate in Lake Elmo. He stated he was unaware a license or permit was necessary and did not know he was in vblation of the load limits since he received verbal approval from the County. IIe stated the City did not inform him he needed a license and it was not his intention to goerate illegally in the City. The Administrator stated he thought either the homeowner or Mr. Brockman was notified of what permits were necessary before the work was done. Mayor Armstrong explained the license requirement and the City's position concerning such. In light of Mr. Brockman's explaination and the communication descrepancy, Mayor Armstrong recommended a license be granted. Armstrong moved,.seconded by Novak to grant a license to Brockman Blacktopping. Motion carried 4-0. The City will send a copy of the Ordinance with the license. HAIR CARE CENTER: Bill Stouvenal gave the background concerning the original sale date, the split of the parcel and the agreementon the septic system use. Parcel A is the beauty shop and is a separate parcel from the Hair Care Center, although they share an adjacent wall. Parcel B (hair Care Center) has a legal easement to use the septic system and drainfield of the building to the south (Pendleton Realty's old office). The Councils primary concern is the septic and drainfield. Mr. Stouvenal assured the Council the system is presently in good operating condition; and requests the City sign the deed in order that it may be filed. Mottaz moved, seconded by Pott, to authorize the Administrator to sign the deed .for. the Hair Care Center. Motion carried 1[-0.