02-02-82 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY COUNCIL MEETING, FEBRUARY J,, 1982 -8- DEMONTREVILLE ACCESS: --Fraser - at a point City control stops. This seems to be the most judicious move given the circumstance. Ownership of the lots has changed and the new owner is a willing seller. -Novak - DNR does not heed the City's agreement to support condemnation. Only way City can have its say is to request that restrictions be placed on the deed. --Whittaker - DNR approached the City and requested support, but this support is not necessary for them to proceed. No need for them to condemn - have a willing seller. DNR did &greeato develop the access as proposed - one lot for parking and leave the other lot vacant, --Al Noreen - would like to hear the City Attorney say, that as it stands, the DNR cannot develop the other lot - not that it is a Council approval item. This is primary concern. --Eder - deed restriction has to be very specific. --Morgan - should require a plan from DNR, showing both lots, and indicating the second lot will not be used for parking or public use, Plan should indicate berming and vegetation around and on the second lot to hinder its use by the public. The plan plus restrictions on the deed should provide a strong position of control. --Mottaz Motion implies or states that if the Council cannot get the guarantees on the use of this land, than the Council will go on record opposing the purchase of the additional -.lot. Time will be provided on the next agenda for a status report. ADJOURN: M/S/P Mottaz/Morgan to adjourn at 9:45 p.m. RESOLUTIONS: 82,5 :Condemnation for Keats MSA 82-6 Hill Large Lot Subdivision