Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, FEBRUARY ;k, 1982 <br />-7- <br />Snow Plowing Policy - <br />Tne Administrator will meet with the new Foreman, Novak & Eder to set <br />the parameters of the plowing policy for Council review. <br />10. COUNCIL REPORTS: <br />A. Eder - No report <br />B. Fraser - No report <br />C. Morgas - No report <br />D. Mottaz - <br />1. Requested the Administrator to get a price on a n6w:•gldss faced <br />aerial map of the City, to be hung in the Council Chambers. <br />If this is too costly, then, get a price on repairing and <br />framing the present aerial map. <br />2;.,Recommended that after the Council Chambers are moved to the <br />new facility, that the locks in the Fire Hall be changed and <br />new keys issued. Keys should be stamped "Do -..Not Duplicate". <br />3. Recommended making a donation to the trust funds of the two <br />firemen that were killed in the Brines fire. <br />M/S/P Mottaz/Novak that the City of Lake Elmo send $100 <br />to each of the trust funds for Bruce Rayburn and Robert Hays. <br />11. SCHEDULE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING: <br />Tabled until April or"May. <br />12. SCHEDULE DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE BUDGET CHANGES: <br />The Council members will prepare individual lists of suggested <br />budget cuts for discussion February 16. <br />DEMONTREVILLE ACCESS - RESIDENT INPUT: <br />Several residents from Demontreville Highlands area came in to <br />discuss the DNR/Derrick proposal for the Demontreville access. <br />Mayor Eder reviewed the Council's action, then opened the floor <br />for their comments. <br />Dave Garloff - questioned the status of the resolution,previously <br />passed, to proceed with condemnation of the Kubitschek lot. <br />Eder - explained the DNR position to avoid condemnation <br />and Derrick's agreement to sell them two lots. Strong sense of <br />feeling that the Council does not like this, but, this may be the <br />way to get it back and get it done. Other approach may put it <br />back in limbo. <br />Greg Foucks - what guarantee is there that in five years the <br />DNR cannot come back and request that extra lot be used for access <br />purposes. <br />Eder - are requesting a stringent restriction, approved <br />by' -the City Attorney, that will remain binding down the road. <br />Mottaz - have to put some faith in DNR and believe they will <br />do what they say, and cover ourselves as best we can. <br />Al Noreen - Has no faith in the word of the DNR. People change <br />and promises fall by the wayside. Not enough guarantees - why <br />give it to them at all. <br />Jim Yarusso - Signed plan and petition as citizens stating we <br />would not oppose these plans. These plans now changed. Would <br />like the petition back that was sent to the DNR and something <br />done that indicates citizen support is withdrawn as the program <br />is changed, <br />