My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-25-85 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1980's
>
1985
>
07-25-85 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 8:00:06 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:05:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES FOR LAKE JANE JULY 24, 1985 PAGE 4 <br />Jim Weyer, 8991 Jane Road, would like to thank the City Council <br />and the City Engineer for the excellent cooperation that they have <br />given to this proposal and shows how responsive this body is to <br />the needs of the people. He would like to encourage them to <br />proceed with the feasibility of Alternative 5, pumping to an <br />alternate location. <br />Questions were brougt up on the assessment procedure. Some felt <br />that this was an opportunity to help neighbors and thinks it <br />should be shared with the rest of the community. Out of the 229 <br />parcels to be assesed, how are they split up between the three <br />lakes. The answer to that question was that it was equal per each <br />of three lakes, but will be researched. Question was raised as to <br />why wasn't the whole city of Lake Elmo assessed. This was <br />answered that it is very difficult to say that the people that <br />lived off of the lakes benefited by pumping Lake Jane. This could <br />be done through an ad valorem type program. <br />Chuck Taylor feels that as much as we don't like this pumping, it <br />has been the only thing we have and to not give up until a <br />permanent solution comes. <br />The following.were negative comments: <br />Ken Sovereign questioned the authority of the City to pump at all <br />into any pond. If they do have the authority, he questions <br />assessing anyone, except Lake Jane residents for such a project. <br />The Lake DeMontreville, Olson Assoc.opposes any expenditures that <br />the City will use for not solving the ultimate problem. They <br />feel that the City should spend their time getting the deadlock <br />out of the 509 Program and let the water build up and this would <br />get it solved. Any interim plan will delay it. <br />Bill Rowe, 8286 Hidden Bay Court N., stated that attempting to <br />help our neighbors has allowed the watershed district to get off <br />the hook without accomplishing anything, but they continue to get <br />money from our assessments. <br />Norm Purrington, 8000 Hill Trail, would like to see water moved <br />out of Olson and DeMontreville into Jane and then out so there is <br />some bounce for the Spring and then people from Olson and <br />DeMontreville could see some benefit. <br />The City Council will discuss and decide whether to act on this <br />proposal or any of the new proposals at the August 6th Council <br />meeting. <br />l <br />The public hearing was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.