Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 Page 5 <br />storage space business in this building, in the old barn and <br />around the old barn in the back. <br />The name of the business is Low Cost Storage which provides <br />storage for boats, motors, trailers, RV's, trucks, cars and <br />motorhomes. The Armstrongs have advertised in the Cimarron <br />Newsletter and have advertisements in the white and yellow pages <br />under Low Cost Storage, outside or inside, RV's, boats, etc. and <br />has the Armstrong's address and phone number. The name Low Cost <br />Storage has been registerd with the Secretary of State, State of <br />MN, and the person that registered the name is Thomas Armstrong. <br />On Monday, February 3rd, a meeting was held, on the request of Mr. <br />Armstrong, to explain some of his points to the City Attorney, <br />City Administrator, Building Inspector and myself. Mr. Armstrong <br />brought up that because the storage space has existed on a farm <br />for years that it is all right to go ahead and build a building, <br />open up a business, advertise, and rent out ninety percent of the <br />new building. Mr. Mazzara read the code that states what uses are <br />permitted in Ag zone and felt that it was stretching it to run an <br />actual for -profit business in an Ag zone. <br />Mr. Armstrong had stated in the meeting that this was a common and <br />customary practice in Lake Elmo in Ag zoning to rent space for <br />people for this use, and he made reference to four farmers, <br />Layhart Friedrich, Steve Raleigh, Gene Peltier and Pete Shiltgen. <br />Mr. Friedrich, Peltier and Shiltgen do not advertise or rent out <br />spaces at their farms, and anything that is stored in those farm <br />buildings are personal belongings, according to Mr. Mazzara. <br />At this point Mr. Armstrong objected to Mr. Mazzara for misquoting <br />him. Mr. Armstrong stated that he would Like as much time as Mr. <br />Mazzara to answer his inaccuracies. <br />Mike Mazzara - If this is defined as a proper use in the Ag zone, <br />my concern if this is allowed this way, we as a City risk that <br />anyone who owns Ag land can go ahead and put up a building of any <br />size and run a business out of there. The City loses control if <br />we don't address the question of running the business out of <br />there. At this point we don't have enough information to make any <br />decisions, but should table this until we can make a decision <br />regarding our code and if we want this to happen in other places. <br />If this is allowed in an Ag zone, it should be qualified and <br />quantified as to how much should be allowed. <br />Tom Armstrong - I object to the procedure that was followed. Mr. <br />Mazzara has had people taking pictures and had contacted the <br />Building Inspector last Fall. I wrote the Building Inspector and <br />answered his questions and heard nothing more. Mr. Mazzara, and <br />other friends of his reported to the City other alleged violations <br />which turned out to be a Soil and Water Conservation District <br />project on my farm. Mr. Mazzara has been making some kind of a <br />witch hunt out of this. Without ever talking to me, Mr. Mazzara <br />put the issue on the Council agenda. The City Administrator <br />contacted my wife to let her know that this issue was on the <br />