Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br />JULY 21, 1987 <br />Mayor Arlyn Christ called the City Council meeting to order at 7:00 <br />p.m. in the City Council Chambers. Present: Christ, Johnson, <br />Armstrong, Graves, Moe (arrived 7:04), City Engineer Bohrer and City <br />Administrator Overby. <br />1. Agenda <br />Add: 3A. Street Light on Jane Road N., 9D. School Crossing Light <br />Update, 9E. Fire Truck <br />M/S/P Armstrong/Graves - to approve the agenda for the July 21, 1987 <br />City Council meeting as amended. (Motion carried 4-0). <br />2. Minutes: July 7, 1987 <br />John Eisele felt the version of the Resolution that was in the minutes <br />was not the way he interpreted the motion. Councilman Graves felt his <br />motion was that the Council would ask the Watershed District to look <br />into providing some sort of relief to the people either by dredging <br />the bay to give them proper access to the lake or rescinding the <br />special assessment. His intent was more accurately recorded in the <br />minutes. <br />Councilwoman Armstrong expressed her intent was to request Valley <br />Branch Watershed to listen to the people, but not necessarily to <br />rescind the assessment or do the dredging. <br />The Resolution numbers are out of sequence and will be corrected. <br />M/S/P Graves/Armstrong - to approve the July 7, 1987 City Council <br />minutes as amended. (See Resolution 87-31). (Motion carried 5-0). <br />3. Claims <br />The Council will discuss at budget time the City's overtime policy and <br />if the audit has to be as thorough and as expensive. Another question <br />raised was if the 201 expenses are pass-thru expenses since they are <br />mandated by the government. <br />M/S/P Graves/Johnson - to approve the July 21, 1987 claims #89010 thru <br />#89058 in the amount of $88,308.67 as presented. (Motion carried <br />5-0) . <br />3A. Street Light Request for Jane Road and Jane Court Intersection <br />Marilyn Benesch, 9377 Jane Court, presented a petition for a street <br />to keep the juveniles off a common lot owned by 14 property owners. <br />There is already a pole there approximately 15 feet off the <br />intersection. There would be no installation cost, but there is a <br />