Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 15, 1987 PAGE 4 <br />A neighbor commented that their new pond is not going down and was <br />concerned if there are any new buildings in that area of the back lot, <br />would cause the water to go up. <br />Mayor Christ closed the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. <br />Mayor Christ was in favor of this variance because he felt in this <br />situation there is a distinct grandfathered application and Mr. Meyer <br />has been a one-man operation for twenty some years with equipment <br />stored outside causing much more of an eyesore than a structure that <br />would enclose the equipment and make it much more esthetically <br />pleasing. Christ believed by the "grandfathered clause" it would not <br />be in any way construed as an increase in the non -conforming activity, <br />but rather an esthetically pleasing addition to an already existing <br />business. <br />Councilman Moe was in favor of granting this variance because of the <br />safety factor with the children that might get hurt that are playing <br />on his equipment which could be housed indoors and out of reach of the <br />children. <br />Councilman Graves addressed his concern of granting two variances; the <br />number of accessory structures and the size of accessory structure. <br />He did not know how to define expansion of an existing non -conforming <br />use. It isn't permitting Mr. Meyer to increase the number of pieces <br />of equipment or taking on new partners. In appearance, it clearly <br />makes it less an R-1 area than it is now, but he has not heard any <br />negative comments from that standpoint. <br />Russ Anderson asked Mr. Meyer if the building would be strictly for <br />equipment and not for antique cars? He would hate to see the building <br />up and the equipment still stored outside. Meyer responded that he <br />already has a pole building in West Lakeland for antique cars. <br />Mr. Meyer said he would be willing to have both parcels combined into <br />one parcel which would clear up the question that if the property is <br />sold and someone might try to develop the rear lot to the east. <br />Councilwoman Armstrong stated that the equipment that will be housed <br />already exists, this would clean up the yard, the other building is <br />being used for this business which everyone in Lake Elmo knows has <br />been there for a long time. Therefore, she made the following motion <br />based on the hardship that the equipment is already there and it would <br />not be expanding his business, they would be planning a place to put <br />the existing amount of equipment he has. <br />Councilman Graves would vote for the motion with the interpretation <br />that this is a grandfathered business and this would just be <br />supporting an existing business and there is no intent to expand the <br />business with the erection of the building and all existing equipment, <br />that is presently stored outside, will be stored inside. <br />accessory <br />building in an R1 zoning district; to grant a variance for a 1800 <br />sq.ft. accessory building at 3303 Lake Elmo Avenue N. for Bernard <br />