My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-17-88 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1980's
>
1988
>
05-17-88 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 7:32:15 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:11:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 17, 1988 PAGE 4 <br />(streets affected by watermain breaks instead of <br />j normal street deterioration) <br />Total Proposed Expenditures $120,500 <br />Funds Available <br />Sealcoat Fund <br />$ <br />40,000 <br />1988 <br />MSA Maintenance Fund <br />$ <br />35,652 <br />1988 <br />Patch & Overlay Fund <br />$ <br />25,000 <br />1987 <br />Patch & Overlay Fund <br />$ <br />25,000 <br />Total <br />Funds Available <br />$125,652 <br />The City Council scheduled public hearings for June 7, 1988 for <br />bituminous overlays on the following streets: <br />1. Hilltop Avenue <br />2. 36th Street and the west 200 feet of 37th Street <br />3. Legion Avenue from 30th Street to the south. <br />4. Tablyn Park <br />5. Tablyn Park 2nd Addition <br />Larry Bohrer reported that these streets would not be benefitted from <br />sealcoating would require more extensive overlays than could be <br />provided by contract maintenance. He recommended that these overlays <br />be considered capital expenditures and assessed. Since the proposed <br />maintenance expenditures equal 95% of available maintenance funds, he <br />does not recommend City participation. <br />Bohrer stated the City has no written assessment formula. We have in <br />the past assessed per lot basis. There are three assessment formulas: <br />1) a unit assessment whereby every lot in a subdivision benefits <br />equally; therefore, each lot pays the same, 2) front footage method, <br />3) a portion assessed on unit basis and a portion on front footage. <br />Bohrer and Councilwoman Armstrong favored the unit method. Councilmen <br />Graves and Johnson wanted a combination of frontage and lot <br />assessment, but also wanted public input on Item 2A. Klondike and 33rd <br />Street. <br />Councilman Graves questioned the difference in "overlay" between #4 <br />(Bohrer memo of 5/17), and #4; Bohrer advised 1988 Maintenance Overlay <br />was for patching/potholes, whereas, the 1987 Maintenance Overlay was <br />for a complete overlay due to watermain breaks. <br />M/S/F - Armstrong/Johnson - to accept Larry Bohrer's recommendation <br />for a public hearing for June 7th for the above Items 1-5.and to <br />include 2A. Klondike and 33rd Street and to provide Larry direction to <br />assess the property on an equal unit basis. (Motion Failed <br />2-2-1<Johnson, Graves, Abstain: Moe>) <br />M/S/P Johnson/Graves - to accept Larry Bohrer's recommendation for a <br />public hearing on June 7th for the above Items 1-5; to include 2A. <br />Klondike and 33rd Street; and, to instruct Larry Bohrer to make a <br />sample assessment roll based on two-thirds of the cost of the overlay <br />being assessed on a unit basis and one-third assessed on a front <br />footage basis. (Motion carried 4-1<Christ: supports the per unit <br />basis>). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.