Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 1988 PAGE 5 <br />j D. RESOLUTION NO. 88-49: REVOKING RESOLUTION 87-29 <br />Jim Friedrich <br />At the August 16, 1988 City Council meeting, the Council directed the <br />staff to invite Joseph Kaiser to the next meeting in order to get his <br />input before any Council action is taken. A note has been signed by <br />Joseph Kaiser stating he understood there was a misunderstanding about <br />the property ownership and he has no objection to what Jim Friedrich <br />is now trying to accomplish. <br />A thorough explanation by staff was covered in the November 1st <br />Backgound Information. Resolution 88-49 will accomplish 1. revoke the <br />resolution which combines parcels G and E as one parcel by adopting a <br />resolution that would show parcels C, G, and E as separate parcels, 2. <br />Eliminate the private road across parcel. C for access to parcels G and <br />E, 3. Agree tht the property owned by Mr. Besch can be divided between <br />the owner of parcel G and Mr. Flicker, acknowledging that this is not <br />a buildable lot and Mr.. Flicker would be increasing the size of his <br />existing lot. Mr. Friedrich would then have a driveway easement <br />across Parcel F to access parcel E. <br />Councilman Johnson suggested a description of the easement for Parcel <br />F should be included on the survey map. <br />M/S/P Johnson/Moe - to adopt Resolution 88-49 amending Resolution <br />87-29 adopted June 16, 1987 granting a simple lot subdivision to Jim <br />Friedrich. (Motion carried 4--0). <br />E. Landscape/Archi_tectual Standards:General Business District <br />The Planning Commission at their meeting of September 12th arrived at <br />a general consensus on architectual standards in relation to exterior <br />wall finishes. At. their October 24th meeting, the Commission <br />recommended that Council approve the amendments to our current General <br />Business landscape requirements, as delineated in the Planning <br />Commission minutes. <br />The Council discouraged the idea of hiring additional staff to check <br />how closely the requirements are followed. Now that our Building <br />Official is a full-time staff person and his workload has not been <br />increased, the Council suggested that this work could be handled by <br />the Building Official. <br />M/S/P Graves/Moe - resolved that the City Attorney and staff are <br />hereby directed to draft the necessary ordinance for amendment to the <br />appropriate section of. the Code to incorporate the following: (Motion <br />carried 4-0) <br />1. General Business District <br />a. architectual standards; <br />b. impervious surface standards; <br />(" c. landscape requirements; <br />