Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 17, 1989 PAGE 4 <br />is important that an individual community and the people within that <br />community are able to set the tone for the development or lifestyle <br />(land utilization) within their own boundaries without having to worry <br />about getting into land use, competitive bidding wars, with adjacent <br />communities. The community should control their own destiny. <br />Graves added you have to balance against the perogati.ve and desires of <br />the individual propertyowners within that area to be able to make what <br />they consider a proper use of the land. Graves suggested a list of <br />criteria be set in this type of legislation where a series of <br />reasonable steps can be taken by both parties to work together and <br />very clearly demonstrate that a City has not shown a willingness over <br />a period of years in certain type of activities, to make decisions to <br />deem a reasonable use of the property. Then an opinion should be <br />available to those landowners to ask for joint detachment/annexation <br />with adjoining communities with the Municipal Board. The process <br />would be more rigorous than what was experienced, previously, with <br />Section 32. <br />In terms of what you want to do in the future to protect the City, <br />Knaak advised the Council, you would want to try to get the repealer <br />through. This Subdivision was a small, seemingly inocuious little <br />thing, that got slipped through by the Municipal Board. There was not <br />wide -spread understanding of its possible use as a tool. <br />Laidig asked for a resolution from the Council which would allow them <br />to get involved in setting hearing dates. A resolution was not <br />offered by the Council, but Councilman Williams anticipated offering a <br />resolution at the next meeting. Laidig will report back to the <br />Council with his findings. <br />7. PLANNING/LAND USE/ZONING: <br />A. PUBLIC HEARING: Variances to lot size, distance <br />between signs, and hours an advertising sign can be <br />illuminated. <br />(Ad Venture Media, Inc., J. Olson) <br />Mayor Dunn opened up the public hearing at 8:45 p.m. in the City <br />Council chambers. <br />Jamie Olson, part owner of the one -acre strip of land and on behalf of <br />Adventure Media, Inc., has applied for a conditional use permit to <br />permit a 10' x 20' advertising sign to be placed on a parcel of land <br />in Section 36 along I-94 in the General Business Zoning District. <br />This advertising sign would require three variances: (1) lot size; <br />(2) distance between signs; (3) hours advertising sign can be <br />illuminated. <br />Former Councilmember Rosemary Armstrong stated the Vali Hi Drive In <br />has been there a long time with a sign. She advised the Council that <br />Jamie Olson was given a final settlement of $34,715 in 1984 for the <br />property acquired by Mn/DOT for the completion of I-94. (Ms. Olson <br />originally had 1.31 acres; Mn/DOT acquired .31 acres, about a 30 foot <br />strip of land along the corridor). The City of Lake Elmo did not take <br />