Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELM CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 17, 1989 PACE 5 <br />anything from this property owner. The Lake Elmo Municipal Code does <br />not provide the circumstances to be a justifiable reason to grant a <br />variance. This is the third time she has come in with an application <br />and there is no measurable changes in her application. Armstrong <br />recommended to the Council that this should be the last time she can <br />come in with this application. <br />Ms. Olson felt the taking of her land by Mn/DOT had nothing to do with <br />this application, that the City of Lake Elmo was the only agency that <br />could grant her the requested variances. Pictures were provided by Ms. <br />Olson showing two signs erected by the Vali Hi Drive -In Theater which <br />is located by her property. Olson added that large panels have been <br />blown out of the projection screen from the wind and has become an <br />eyesore because it has not been maintained, consequently, devaluing <br />her property. <br />Mayor Dunn closed the public hearing at 9:1.0 p.m. <br />Councilman Hunt stated, contrary to what Ms. Olson has indicated, a <br />conversation with staff. and Adeel Lari, Right-of-way Engineer for <br />Mn/DOT, a final settlement was made in 1984. Mr. Lari stated that <br />Mn/DOT does take into consideration local zoning ordinances when <br />determining compensation and the propertyowner had the opportunity to <br />ask for a "total take" that is, she could have argued that the 1 acre <br />parcel remaining was non -conforming to local ordinances, and <br />therefore, of no use to her. This may have increased the $34,715 <br />compensation given for the 0.31 acres. <br />Administrator Morrison informed the Council that Mr. O'Neal, owner of <br />the Vali.-Hi Drive In, had called to voice his objection to Ms. Olson's <br />application when it was before the Planning Commission. At that <br />meeting, Ms. Olson brought up the two signs that have been erected by <br />Vali-Hi Drive In. Building Official Jim McNamara has talked to Mr. <br />O'Neal. who advised him he has a site for a sign which was being drawn <br />up and the sign will be constructed within the next 3 months, if the <br />weather allows. The two existing signs will be replaced by one <br />permanent sign. The Council decided if this sign was not erected <br />within three months and the existing signs removed, the Vali Hi -Drive <br />In CUP will be modified. <br />The Council carefully reviewed Ms. Olson's application, and based upon <br />their examination of the arugment and evidence presented, as well as <br />knowledge of the nature and size of the parcel in question, they made <br />the following: <br />FINDINGS OF FACT: <br />1. That the public hearing notice was duly published and sent <br />to all. adjacent propertyowners. <br />2. That the parcel in question is owned by Jamie, Wendy, and <br />Todd Olson. <br />3. That a letter was written to the applicant, dated <br />May 17, 1985, advising her this parcel of land does not <br />