My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-89 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1980's
>
1989
>
03-21-89 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 7:22:30 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:14:34 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 21, 1989 PAGE 2 <br />I M/S/P Moe/Aunt - to approve the March 21, 1989 Claims #91538 thru #91584 <br />as presented. (Motion carried 5-0). <br />4. REAPP REPORT <br />Todd Williams reported they have received three proposals from engineers <br />for review of the Lake Elmo Landfill EIS. A ReAPP Subcommittee is <br />reviewing these proposals and scheduling interviews with these engineers <br />for March 31, 1989. <br />The following questions were asked by ReAPP: <br />(a.) Does the City Council want the City Engineer to review <br />the proposals? <br />City Engineer, Larry Bohrer, responded he would not review the proposal, <br />but their Environmental Engineering Dept would allow 1 hour for each <br />review, and supply a recommendation to the Council. <br />MIS Hunt/Graves - to direct the City Engineer to review the proposals <br />submitted for review of the Lake Elmo Landfill EIS <br />M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to amend the motion to include setting a limit of <br />$400. (Motion carried 5-0). <br />M/S/P Hunt/Graves - to authorize the Environmental Engineering Dept. of <br />TKDA review the three proposals submitted for review of the Lake Elmo <br />Landfill EIS with a limit: set of $400. (Motion carried 5-0). <br />(b.) Attorney Chuck Dayton has indicated interest in reviewing the <br />proposals and being involved in the interviewing process, for. which Ellen <br />Sampson has expressed a cost of $1,2.00 +/-$200. <br />M/S/ Williams/Hunt - To authorize Attorney Chuck Dayton review the three <br />engineers' proposals and participate in the interviews <br />M/S/P - Williams/Hunt - to amend the motion to include setting the <br />expenditure of $1200. (Motion carried 5-0). <br />M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to authorize Attorney Chuck Dayton review the three <br />engineers' proposals and participate in the interviews with an expenditure <br />set for $1200. (Motion carried 5-0). <br />(c.) Todd Williams requested approval of the appointment of himself as <br />the key contact between the City and the attorney and engineer in matters <br />pertaining to the landfill. Administrator Morrison will continue to be <br />the key contact between the City and the County. <br />M/S/P Williams/Graves - to approve the appointment of Todd Williams as the <br />key contact between the City and the attorney and engineer in matters <br />pertaining to the landfill. Administrator Morrison will continue to be <br />the key contact between the City and the County. (Motion carried 5-0). <br />(d.) ReAPP requests Attorney Dayton examine the wording of the proposal <br />for a "scorecard" to be applied to the landfill siting decisions and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.