Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 16, 1989 PAGE 12 <br />i The Council determined this was worth consideration, but suggested waiting <br />until we see what the VBWD has planned for 1990 when they can consider the <br />entire package. Councilmen Graves and Williams noted they were not in <br />agreement on straightening out streambeds. <br />F. Section 32 Report: Mike Black <br />City Administrator Morrison recommended having our financial consultants <br />come up with financing alternatives before the Administrator and City <br />Engineer meet with Scott Renee and Frank Langer to analyze the tax impact <br />consequence of varying land uses of properties within the MUSA line. <br />Councilman Williams stated his concern of spending money on such a small <br />amount of propertyowners that don't even live here. If there was a <br />specific project to put a sewer line in, we could throw those financial <br />costs into the project. <br />-Co rrc i-l-nr&rr -Hunt -not i-n- -f-&� o-f-speai-a-1- � .gx ou a s_ -t.a axLvest <br />-a7rotirer` y 3i?00 .- - t� ri o- err t it�ul ar- s tom,- -money ems- beem-pJz=1ed- <br />�nxth t �Or �ortstzl n a ,- anel £- t-pnopez-t4y-o�u-rex-s..ar-e- -not Kci l c 7 tea. 4anrat <br />wirtir as,- tlris�s the cmcl o-f- it.- '(Amended 6-6-89) <br />Councilman Graves felt we needed to know what financing was available to <br />make this take place. If we actively pursue this, we would need an update <br />of our feasibility report. The developers and propertyowners need to know <br />what the cost would be and, based on all that the City is doing, would <br />only strengthen the City's position <br />M/S/P Graves/Hunt - to authorize expenditures of $400 maximum for the City <br />Engineer to update the 1985 sewer and water feasibility plan and <br />authorization for spending up to $3000 for the financial consultants to <br />work with the staff on financial altern es; based on: this is the only <br />area that has sewer capacity within they= bixas-(D-f- %-3,1-an -par-t <br />-0-f--3e,c k=-3-3•; that the City Council has already spent $25,000 on various <br />studies in the past; and the City Council considers this as a good faith <br />effort. (Motion carried 5-0). <br />M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to direct the City Administrator to write a letter <br />to the Municipal. Board requesting they delay scheduling a meeting on the <br />pending annexiation/petition of Sunburrow until the end of June to advance <br />the negotiating efforts of Lake Elmo/Oakdale. (Motion carried 5-0). <br />M/S/P Graves/Moe - to adjourn the City Council meeting at 11:30 p.m. <br />(Motion carried 5-0). <br />"'Amended 6-6-89 Paragraph replaced with the following: <br />Councilman Hunt was not in favor of spending $3,000 on special interest <br />ABut at this particular stage however, the monext has beenbu.dgeted <br />for consultants and if the propertyowners are not willing to work with us, <br />this is the end of it. <br />-------------------------- <br />Resolution No. 89-28 Ordering Improvemeztsfor 15th St. <br />89-29 Ordering Improvements for 20th St. <br />89-30 Ordering Improvements for 38th St., 39th St., Innsdale <br />89-31 Approving Future Land Use ?lap, Direct Amend. to Comp Plan <br />89-32 Grant General Concept Plan, The Forest <br />Ordinance No. 8024 Amend the 1979 Municipal Code, Sect. 301.070C <br />