My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-91 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1991
>
05-21-91 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 6:20:53 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:19:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL <br />JOINT MEETING WITH CITY ATTORNEY <br />MAY 29, 1991 <br />Mayor Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:15 p.m. in the Council <br />Chambers. Present City Council: Dave Johnson, Dick Johnson, Williams, <br />Hunt, Mottaz. Present Planning Commission: John, Johnston, Conlin, <br />Enes, Stevens, Weeks, McLeod, Schubert, DeLapp. Also present: City <br />Attorney Filla, City Planner Black, Administrator Kueffner. <br />Mayor Johnson turned the meeting over to City Attorney Jerry Filla. <br />Mr. Filla stated he wanted this meeting to share some ideas, and for <br />everyone to understand the development process better and how the city <br />is involved in the process. <br />The purpose for developer regulations and zoning is to allow people to <br />enjoy their property as best they can without creating a nuisance to <br />their neighbors. In Minnesota, most of the litigation involving <br />development regulations involves a balancing of the public's right to <br />adopt legislation against the rights of property owners to use their <br />property. If you do a very good job of adopting regulations which are <br />reasonable, then you can restrict use. <br />The other thing that is very clear in Minnesota is that the <br />legislature has said, and the courts agree, you have to move the <br />development process along. Not only can you adopt reasonable <br />regulations, but you have to apply them fairly and in a reasonable <br />time frame. It's not fair for a developer to have to wait a year and <br />a half for development approval from a City. Time is money, and <br />typically the development proposals that this City sees are not that <br />complicated. The process for development approval, in Minnesota, <br />should not take more than 120 days from the beginning of a completed <br />application to preliminary approval. <br />The city can adopt regulations that define a completed application. A <br />completed application means that the developer have A,B,C,D,E,F all <br />lined tap, and once the developer has everything together then the time <br />period starts. The City has adequate time to review a proposal as <br />long as the City makes stare the application is complete. <br />The development process means any application for zoning, rezoning, <br />code amendment, subdivision, variance, building permits, anything that <br />requires approval from the City. Most importantly, when someone <br />comes to the City for development approval that they have EVERYTHING <br />we will need BEFORE being put on an agenda. We should not put <br />development applications on Planning Commission agendas or City <br />Council agendas until the item is ready, it's not fair to the City to <br />present an incomplete application, and it's not fair to the applicant. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.