My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-21-92 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1992
>
01-21-92 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 3:36:32 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:22:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 21, 1992 6 <br />movement will not be obstructed. <br />City Council: Request the Fire Chief and Sheriff review the <br />site for what on -site maneuvering is needed and come back to the <br />Council with a report. Also, the site should be reviewed as <br />construction is starting. <br />Mayor Johnson voiced his concern on the explosive potential <br />of the polyethylene plastic used in the building. The Council <br />requested the applicant provide a flammability rating on the <br />plastic to the Fire Chief. <br />Hoffman: We know the distance between the building of Phase <br />I and Phase II and could explain it either on a drawing or to the <br />Fire Marshall and other emergency city officials. In discussion <br />with the Fire Chief we will provide him with this flammability <br />rating. <br />Condition 10. City Staff prepare a written condition clearly <br />stating the road maintenance responsibilities and associated <br />costs to be born by the applicant. <br />The City Engineer, Tom Prew, reported the City has to <br />contract with the County for road grading and they set it up on a <br />rotational basis. We would have to get a private contractor to <br />take care of the calcium chloride. <br />City Council: How can we assess the impact of their <br />development on that road? Is there any way other than vehicle <br />counts? Can we put a condition in the CUP permit? <br />Prow responded they can look at the number and type of <br />vehicles the operation would use, and what type of vehicles the <br />homes use. Then we can figure out the net effect of each, farm <br />operation and residential, on the road and come up with a <br />rational basis or look at, an ad valorem assessment. <br />Mayor Johnson pointed out in the Agricultural use zone the <br />policy is that we will not allow uses that would expand a need <br />for improved city services. <br />Hoffman: Linders have in the past provided the dust control <br />and agreed to the extent that if more than normal grading and <br />dust control is required that can be attributed to the use of the <br />OGreenhouse, we would pay our reasonable share of that. If it <br />ever came to the point for requiring blacktopping, based on an <br />accurate traffic count of usage by the Linders, then we would <br />expect the assessment consistent with this usage. If the thought <br />were that because we were using it more than other people using <br />the road, that we then become responsible for all of the <br />maintenance of the road, we would consider that unfair. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).