My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-12-92 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1992
>
05-12-92 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 3:36:32 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:22:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The following was decided: <br />( Engage Kathy Aho assuming the city orders all four projects <br />and create a financial package consisting of: cost per <br />resident per year, resident's options, amount sold in bonds, <br />amount assessed, amount collected in connection charges. <br />Request financial experts to get back to city staff (Marilyn <br />and Tom). Put $41,322 in Street Improvement Funds. (Prew <br />noted this amount is an optional assessment). <br />Councilmen Hunt, Williams, Mottaz, and Johnson supported the <br />ordinance requiring septic systems to be brought up to code. <br />M/S/P Dick Johnson/Williams - to direct staff to meet with <br />Financial Planner and determine the best method for <br />financing the 1992 Improvement Area Funding Review with a <br />report scheduled for first meeting in June. (Motion carried <br />5-0). <br />Administrator Kueffner explained other cities hold their <br />assessment hearings before they award the bid and asked if <br />the Council would be interested in this procedure. The City <br />would specify a date for opening the bids, open the bids, <br />calculate the proper assessments, send out the public <br />hearing notices. Roughly two weeks after the bids were open <br />we would have a public hearing. People have 30 days from <br />the public hearing to appeal the assessments. Approx. 45 <br />days after the bids are open, the Council will know if there <br />are problems with residents appealing their assessments. <br />Tom Prew asked if the Council was in favor of using some <br />part of the proposed surface water management utility to <br />help pay off the $88,000. Councilman Williams, Mottaz, and <br />Mayor Williams indicated they had no objection to using a <br />portion. Councilman Hunt indicated at this point he was not <br />opposed to this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.