My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-16-93 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1993
>
03-16-93 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 3:09:44 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:25:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Notes on meeting with State Representatives and Oakdale Council <br />( members on March 12, 1993 at 1.00 p.m. in the State Offices: <br />Pam Neary's office. <br />Present: Pam Neary, State Representative <br />Ted Bearth, Mayor, Oakdale <br />Sheri Timmerman, Oakdale Councillor <br />Wyn John, Mayor, Lake Elmo <br />Rita Conlin, Lake Elmo Councillor <br />Wyn John circulated notes he had made on the March 2 meeting. <br />Pam Neary then summarized her understanding of the position as at the <br />end of the last meeting: <br />1. That Oakdale and Lake Elmo were agreed on the need to provide a <br />sewer, along 4th Street, in Sections 32 & 33, to be jointly funded by <br />the cities. <br />2. That sewer capacity would be transferred from the MinDoT land <br />areas to support Lake Elmo's Business Park District. The sewer <br />would be sized to be adequate for this additional capacity, and for <br />potential longer range extension of the MUSA along I-94. The <br />additional costs would be borne by Lake Elmo. <br />3. The question of land transfer to Oakdale was unresolved. Lake Elmo <br />was reluctant to hand over the land to Oakdale without some <br />recompense for the loss in revenue that this transfer <br />represented. It was agreed that Lake Elmo would approach the <br />landowners to see whether they were still interested in transfer to <br />Oakdale, provided a sewer were made available. This would permit <br />a boundary adjustment between the cities to be considered. <br />Wyn John then reported on the results of contacts with a number of the <br />Section 32 & 33 landowners. This indicated that some did not mind in <br />which city they were located as long as sewer were available at the <br />earliest. Some felt that after being in conflict with Lake Elmo for so long, <br />they did not wish to rejoin the city which had resisted their requests for <br />sewer and water service. Others did not want their land to be within two <br />cities after a boundary relocation. There were some on small lots, who had <br />not petitiuoned in the first place, who wanted to stay in Lake Elmo. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.