My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-02-94 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1994
>
08-02-94 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:51:18 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:28:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
■ Poor water clarity <br />■ Odor <br />■ Litter <br />■ Level control <br />■ Fertilizer control <br />As noted in the North St. Paul plan, water level concerns (either too high or too low) received <br />the most attention. The North St. Paul plan proposed that sediment be removed at storm sewer <br />inlets into Silver Lake in 1991. <br />4.2.1.6 VBWD Water Oualitv Management Goals <br />Silver Lake is identified as a Category I water body in Section 3.2 -- Water Quality <br />Management Plan, based on existing water quality data and its existing and desired recreational <br />uses. A Category I water body fully supports all water -based recreational activities including <br />swimming, scuba diving, and snorkeling. Further description of this classification is included <br />in Section 3.2. <br />Section 3.2 also shows that Silver Lake is to be managed to protect and possibly restore <br />its water quality. Because of its high total phosphorus and somewhat high chlorophyll a <br />concentrations (see Figure _), Section 3.2 also shows Silver Lake as "borderline" in terms of <br />the current and expected use of the lake conflicting with it existing water quality. The lake's <br />watershed is nearly fully developed. Additional nutrient loading due to further development <br />or other land use changes in the watershed is not anticipated. Future watershed management <br />efforts should, therefore, focus on preserving the treatment efficiency of existing runoff <br />detention basins and wetlands throughout the watershed. This focus will ensure that the <br />impacts of runoff from the lake's urbanized watershed are minimized, and that the current <br />water quality of the lake is preserved. <br />VBWD will complete hydrologic and nutrient budgets for Silver Lake, depending on the <br />availability of funds, See Section 3.2 — Water Quality Management Plan for more information <br />about hydrologic and nutrient budgets. The North St. Paul plan proposed preparation of a <br />water quality study in 1995 for the Silver Lake watershed. <br />Ramsey County requested that VBWD evaluate the current treatment efficiency of the <br />wetlands and basins to the north (upstream) of Silver Lake. This evaluation would determine <br />whether their existing treatment efficiency is within the range of expected efficiency. If the <br />treatment efficiency is lower than expected, VBWD will determine whether maintenance or <br />modification of the wetlands and basins is necessary to improve their treatment efficiency. Any <br />wetland modifications would have to comply with the rules of the Wetland Conservation Act <br />and VBWD. <br />VBWD will consider evaluating current treatment efficiencies of the wetlands and basins <br />upstream of Silver Lake in conjunction with the completion of hydrologic and nutrient budgets. <br />VBWD will then determine the need to modify the upstream wetlands and/or treatment basins <br />to improve their treatment efficiency. VBWD will also determine if maintenance alone will <br />provide the needed improvement. Modifications to improve treatment efficiency can be <br />expensive. <br />23\82\045\SEC4,RPT\KMH 3 DRAFT: June 23, 1994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.