My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-02-94 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1994
>
08-02-94 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:51:18 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:28:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.2.3.3 VBWD Water Quantity Management Goals <br />Since development is now occurring adjacent to Echo Lake, the additional storage needs <br />to be obtained and the implementation of a project is of high priority. VBWD considered the <br />following two options for obtaining additional storage on Echo Lake: <br />1. Lower the outlet elevation (normal water level) of Echo Lake by 0.5 feet, to <br />Elevation 995.0, to create additional storage without increasing the 100-year flood <br />level of Echo Lake. In this case, easement acquisition would be unnecessary. <br />Based on the results of a 1992 survey which determined the location of the 995.0 <br />contour in Echo Lake, VBWD decided that the impact of lowering the normal <br />water elevation on the wetland portion of the lake (the southwest side) would be <br />too great. Therefore, this option was rejected. <br />2. Raise the 100-year flood elevation by restricting the allowable outflow, as stated in <br />the previous VBWD Water Management Plan. Then, additional storage is created <br />by increasing the 100-year flood elevation of Echo Lake to 997.6, approximately one <br />foot above the existing 100-year flood elevation. At the time of development, the <br />Echo Lake Addition developer dedicated drainage easements up to the proposed <br />100-year flood elevation of 997.6. However, additional easements need to be <br />acquired from the six other Echo Lake shoreline property owners. <br />VBWD believes option 2 is the most feasible option. Based on VBWD's analysis of the <br />watershed, the outlet from Echo Lake is proposed to be a 2-inch diameter orifice at <br />Elevation 995.5 (the existing outlet elevation). Then, the 100-year flood elevation would be <br />997.6 and the Echo Lake emergency overflow would be the low overflow point near the outlet, <br />at Elevation 997.8. The proposed outlet control structure would be located in a manhole in the <br />same location as the existing outlet pipe. This project is anticipated to be combined with the <br />VBWD will consider monitoring Echo Lake water levels, either using VBWD staff or <br />requesting that the DNR install a gage. <br />4.2.3.4 Water -Quality and DNR Data <br />Sampling of Echo Lake in 1971, 1972, 1984, and 1991 by the Watershed District and in <br />1975, 1977, and 1978 by the School District, has shown the lake to have variable, but relatively <br />high phosphorus concentrations and little thermal stratification. Echo Lake currently exhibits <br />relatively poor water quality. Average summer water quality data collected from the lake are <br />presented on Figure 4-3. Data from 1971, 1977 and 1978 are not shown because the sampling <br />occurred in the fall and winter. The 1991 data were compared to criteria used to denote a <br />lake's nutrient "status," and the effects of the nutrients on the general water quality and/or <br />trophic conditions of a water body (HALMS, 1988). Based on a comparison of the lake's <br />nutrient (i.e, total phosphorus) concentration to these criteria, Echo Lake would be assigned <br />a trophic status of hypereutrophic. This means that the lake is extremely rich in nutrients. An <br />evaluation of the effects of the nutrients on the general water quality of the lake <br />(i.e., chlorophyll 4 concentrations and Secchi disc transparency) also results in a hypereutrophic <br />classification. This means that the lake is responding to the nutrient load as expected, and that <br />nuisance algal blooms are a common occurrence. Due to these algal blooms, water <br />transparency is generally poor: <br />23\82\045\SEC4.RPT\KMH 8 DRAFT:, June 23, 1994 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.