Laserfiche WebLink
City failed to state any reasoning for not following its <br />( 1979 Comprehensive Plan. <br />3. That Plaintiffs are not entitled to judgment requiring <br />Defendant City of Lake Elmo is issue permits for its proposed <br />development. Plaintiffs are, however, entitled to the opportunity <br />to resubmit their application to the City Council for consideration <br />based upon the City's 1979 Comprehensive Plan. <br />4. That all other Motions not specifically addressed herein <br />are hereby DENIED. <br />5. That the Washington County Court Administrator shall serve <br />a true and correct copy of this Order by U.S. mail upon counsel for <br />the above -named parties. Such mailing shall constitute due and <br />proper service of this Order for all purposes. <br />Dated: <br />VDavid E. Doyrddher <br />Judge of District ourt <br />Li <br />