My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-01-95 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1995
>
08-01-95 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:28:41 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:30:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 1, 1995 PAGE 2 <br />A-3. Mayor John reported the VBWD public hearing on the Olson Lake Estates Pond Outlet <br />Project was very well attended by residents of Lake Elmo. The City Council directed staff to send <br />a letter to the VBWD stating the City was against an ad valorem Tax over every household in the <br />watershed district. The VBWD will meet again on August 10, a regularly scheduled meeting, to <br />vote on the project. <br />4. B. WASHINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS - CR 13 (Inwood) Project. <br />The City Council and public received copies of an outline of the project, provided by Washington <br />County. The County held an open house, in July, for the affected residents, to gather input. <br />Washington County Representatives for the street project - Chris Thornton, Design Coordinator, <br />and Don Theisen, Deputy Director, presented the issues, alternatives, cost share by the City, and <br />proposed improvements for County Road 13/Inwood Ave. The County's preferred alternative is a <br />40' rural section south of 27th Street, and a 44' urban section north of 27th Street. A separated <br />bike path was discussed, as well as providing extra parking as requested by residents at the <br />open house, and turn lanes/by-pass lanes. A separated bike path would require extra grading <br />and surfacing. The project will use State aid funds (gas -tax) and is based on the Minnesota <br />standards required. The proposed cost share of the City would be $11,400 on the low end, and <br />$46,000 on the high end. The total cost of the project will be approx. $600,000, even on the high <br />end the proposed cost share of the City is only 5%. <br />Dan Novak, 8520 Ironwood Tr., asked how long a turn lane is? Ms. Thornton answered 300 feet. <br />Mr. Novak asked the distance from Stillwater Blvd. to Ironwood Tr.? The answer was 750 feet. <br />Mr. Novak asked if the small wetland at the SW corner of Stillwater Blvd. and Inwood Ave. would <br />be replaced. Mr. Theisen stated it would be investigated in the process. Mr. Novak stated the <br />width of the road is unacceptable and proposed a 32 foot wide road improvement. <br />The County representatives advised the Council that because turn lanes would then have to be <br />made longer (to allow for the gradual line), the 32 foot width would not be a consistent width the <br />entire length of the street, therefore less than half the road would be 32 feet anyway. <br />Mr. Novak stated he doesn't see the need for turn lanes. <br />Paul Eberhard, representing The Eberhard's at 2298 Inwood Ave., stated he was initially <br />concerned about the right-of-way coming right up to the farm house door step, but that the County <br />took that into consideration and is okay with it. However, he stated he does have a concern <br />about speeding. Mr. Eberhard stated he is against a separated bike path, unless it is constructed <br />on the Park Reserve side of the road. <br />Ms. Thornton and Mr. Theisen asked the City Council for concept approval tonight, so that they <br />may proceed with designing the formal plans and mitigation, right-of-way, and impact needs. The <br />County is targeting 1996 to begin construction. <br />The council deliberated the concept proposal, future development plans of the City, and the <br />necessity of the width proposed by the County. The council discussed the improvements and <br />width to Jamaca Ave. (MSA standards). It was recognized that a 32' wide street has a 4' shoulder <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.